JOHN Bercow has rebuked an SNP MP who referred to peers as "ermine vermin".
The Speaker said it was not appropriate for such a comparison to be made by David Linden (Glasgow East) as the Commons debated proposals to halt moves to cut the number of MPs from 650 to 600.
Mr Linden, referring to the House of Lords as he outlined the contents of his speech, noted: "I want to use a few minutes of my time to talk about the other place along the corridor - the ermine vermin."
Conservative Huw Merriman (Bexhill and Battle) later raised a point of order, telling Mr Bercow he had been taken aback by the comment.
Mr Merriman added: "The Member for Glasgow East during his speech referred to peers as vermin in ermine.
"I believe I have actually confirmed this with the frontbench and I wonder if I could seek your advice as to whether this was unbecoming of this place."
Mr Bercow agreed it was unbecoming of the Commons and Mr Linden, adding: "It was said, as far as I can imagine, as I didn't hear it, sotto voce.
"If it was muttered inaudibly by accident, I am frankly surprised because in the short time (Mr Linden) has been a member of this place I've always thought him an articulate fellow who speaks lucidly in terms readily audible and intelligible.
"If, on the other hand, it was a deliberate ruse to blurt these words out in a manner intended not to be heard but nevertheless to be incorporated in the official report, that is unworthy of somebody of the budding aspirations and potential stature of (Mr Linden).
"I hope he will not resort to such a tactic again.
"We should, seriously, treat each other in this place with basic courtesy - and in referring to members of the (Lords), it is not appropriate to make that comparison or to draw that analogy.
"We'll leave it there for now."
In his speech, Mr Linden went on to say it is "absolutely ridiculous" the Lords - with around 800 peers - is only surpassed in size by China's National People's Congress.
He criticised the continued presence of hereditary peers, adding more widely: "I think the thing that is even more scandalous is the fact they come in, clock in, get their £300 a day tax-free and then leave."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel