POLITICIANS are often caught between a rock and a hard place and this time it was the turn of Damian Green aka the First Secretary of State.
Now Mr G, who was standing in for the big T as she was in the Middle East, is being investigated for alleged inappropriate behaviour; claims that he had made inappropriate advances to a young female activist and that pornography was found by police on a computer in his office.
His Shadow, Labour’s Emily Thornberry, was quick off the mark and appeared to be seeking to corner the First Sec for a metaphorical drubbing.
“Can I ask the First Secretary of State about a simple point of principle? Is he happy to be held to the same standards in government that he required of others while in opposition?”
Mr G shifted uneasily as this appeared to be a reference to his little local difficulty.
After the First Sec insisted all ministers should respect and obey the ministerial code, Ms Thornberry then declared: “The First Secretary of State looked rather perturbed at my line of questioning but he does not need to worry; I really am not going there.”
In fact, Ms T then went on a meandering journey, asking whether he remembered the question on the NHS he had asked at PMQs almost 17 years ago. Of course, he did. Not.
However, the First Sec did indeed look perturbed when the issue of sexual harassment was taken up by the no-nonsense Labour inquisitor John Mann.
Noting how “being believed, reliving trauma, fear of publicity, a culture of denial” were some of the reasons why many women were reluctant to report rape, assault and sexual harassment, the Nottinghamshire MP asked Mr G to lead by example and on behalf of the Government, “apologise to the victims who Parliament and Government have been letting down?"
The First Sec shuffled uncomfortably at the dispatch box as to apologise might give the impression he was in some way saying sorry for the allegations he is facing and is denying forcefully. Not to apologise, when the PM had, would also look awkward.
In the end, Mr G opted for the latter, saying all parties needed to improve complaints procedures and other aspects of the "culture of politics" to ensure young men and women at Westminster felt comfortable.
But until the inquiry is concluded, the rock and the hard place will remain for the First Sec.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here