Native Scots pine trees can grow to 35 metres high and live for 700 years. They are not just part of our countryside and our environment, they are part of our culture and history.
Remnants of the ancient Caledonian pine forest, they connect us with the past and they help us cope with the present. Gnarled, knotty and majestic, they deserve our love and need our protection.
One of the most important bodies involved in looking after Scots pine is Forestry Commission Scotland, the country’s largest landowner and an arm of government. It is responsible for a major proportion of our precious wildlife, and for making thousands of visitors welcome.
So it is distressing to learn, as we report today, that the commission’s environmental priorities may now be taking second place to commercial conifer plantations. A short term restructuring and a longer term reorganisation have both generated widespread fears that gains of recent years may be lost.
Instead of devoting time and expertise to conserving wildlife and enhancing recreation for public benefit, forestry officials may have to spend more effort planting and tending Sitka spruce, an alien blight on the landscape.
This is not a welcome prospect, and it deserves wider attention and debate. Maybe the intentions of the commission and ministers have been misunderstood, and the future won’t be as bad as some suggest. But we need to be sure. The commission’s restructuring proposals should be reconsidered, and ministers should listen to criticisms from across the board on its planned reorganisation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here