IT was no surprise when the sexual misconduct scandal spread from Hollywood to the political world.
Politics is dominated by men with power and it was always naive to think that some would not abuse their position.
It took Aamer Anwar, a high profile lawyer, to ensure that the spotlight was shone on Holyrood as well as Westminster.
His statement to the Sunday Herald earlier this month, that he was aware of a “catalogue” of sexual harassment at the Scottish Parliament, rocked our political establishment.
It should also be noted that many of the most serious claims are also now emanating from local government, an area of public life that has been overlooked so far.
The key point to address is how our leaders react and how they reform a complaints system that does not currently have the confidence of victims.
Holyrood set up up a dedicated hotline to deal with complaints, but some senior figures in the Parliament want the process outsourced to an independent body.
Councillors are coming forward to share their experiences, but it is far from clear whether the processes local authorities have in place are fit for purpose either.
Perhaps setting up a national hotline, run by an independent organisation, would be a better way of handling complaints relating to Holyrood and councils.
Such a system would encompass staff in these organisation, but not ordinary party members. Political parties also have a duty to drag their internal procedures into the twenty first century.
The Harvey Weinstein scandal was a disgrace on a number of levels, but his appalling behaviour has provided an opportunity to deal with an issue that has been ignored for too long.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here