By David Hughes
A BREXIT war chest of at least £3 billion has been set aside to prepare the UK for the prospect of no deal with Brussels.
Eurosceptics have put pressure on Chancellor Philip Hammond to commit money to preparations for a “no deal” scenario to show the European Union that the UK is serious about Theresa May’s threat to walk away from talks if the offer from Brussels is unacceptable.
At his Budget, Mr Hammond said Brussels should not “doubt our resolve” as he put money aside to ensure the country is “prepared for every possible outcome”.
Extra investment is likely to be required in customs infrastructure and changing regulators as a result of leaving the EU, with a no-deal scenario likely to mean more spending than maintaining many current rules.
The Chancellor’s actions were criticised by Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable, who said the money was “disappearing down a Brexit black hole”.
Mr Hammond said securing progress on a trade deal would be “one of the biggest boosts we can provide to businesses and families”.
He said almost £700 million had been invested in Brexit preparations and he was setting aside £3bn more over the next two years, adding: “And I stand ready to allocate further sums if and when needed. No one should doubt our resolve.”
Sir Vince said: “It tells you everything you need to know about this Government’s priorities that more funding has been found for Brexit than for our struggling NHS, schools and police. Money that could have been invested hiring thousands of teachers and police officers is instead going to pay for a Tory Hard Brexit.
“Meanwhile, the Government’s strategy remains so vague we still don’t know what the final damage to our economy and living standards will be.”
“This underlines why the British people must be able to choose at the end of this process whether to accept the final deal or stay in the EU.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel