BUSINESS Manager Sean Wood said overall the Budget was underwhelming.
But he urged Finance Secretary Derek McKay to match Philip Hammond’s decision to raise the higher-rate income tax threshold to £46,350.
The rate in Scotland is currently £43,000 and if the Scottish Finance Secretary freezes it for a second year in a row next month, Scots earning over the threshold will be £670 a year worse off than people living south of the Border.
Mr Wood, 33, who lives in Edinburgh with his wife and three children, believes the threshold should be matched in Scotland – or the gap closed at the very least.
He welcomed the ending of VAT bills for Scotland’s emergency services and the stimulus in the North Sea but believes Scotland did not do very well out of the Budget.
But, the motor industry worker warmly welcomed support for electric vehicles through the establishment of a new £400 million charging infrastructure fund, an extra £100m in Plug-In-Car Grant, and £40m for charging research and development which he said could revolutionise driving.
He said: “I found the Budget fairly underwhelming. It will do nothing to help the working class or stimulate people’s spending power.
“I am obviously not happy at the prospect of paying hundreds of pounds more a year than people living south of the Border and I would certainly urge the same measures to be introduced up here.
“The measures to help the electric vehicle market with the infrastructure fund are certainly encouraging and could really revolutionise electric car driving.
“We have seen a lot of interest in electric cars but people have been put off by the lack of charging points and infrastructure. This could see a massive rise in electric cars which is good for the environment and health.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article