A union has warned of the risk of compulsory redundancies for council employees after councillors voted to cut redundancy terms.
The SNP leader of East Dunbartonshire Council has accused his Conservative and Liberal Democrat colleagues of treating council employees with "abject contempt" by announcing the decision ahead of consulting the workforce.
Councillors voted to cut the maximum added years for pensionable employees from 10 to three, reduce the maximum discretionary payments from 66 weeks to 30, and introduce a maximum payback period of two years.
The changes were passed at a recent council meeting by 10 votes to 12, with the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats in favour and other councillors against.
The vote instructs management to issue 90-day notices next March to all staff who do not agree to the changes voluntarily, terminating their current contracts and re-engaging them on the new terms and conditions.
Unison said the changes were a "train wreck" and could lead to compulsory redundancies.
Councillor Gordon Low, who heads the SNP minority administration, said: "Since the election in May, the LibDem and Tory groups have talked loftily about the importance of genuine consultation before making decisions that affect council services, even though their actions in the past have not matched that rhetoric.
"But the rhetoric has now been turned on its head when it comes to the council's own workforce, who have been offered nothing more than a sham consultation, where the decision to impose new terms and conditions has already been made.
"As the largest employer in the area, we should lead by example, but instead to treat our employees with such abject contempt is shameful."
He added: "While everyone recognises the financial constraints across the public sector, this represents a race to the bottom in terms of national standards on redundancy provision, motivated by an ideology that seeks to make the cost of redundancies as cheap as possible.
"It is also grossly iniquitous to place current staff in such severe detriment, compared to the packages on which former employees have been released over recent years."
Councillor Low said the changes will have "profound implications both for the council's relations with its workforce and for future budgetary decisions" and his party will attempt to overturn the decision.
In a letter to members, Unison convener Thomas Robertson said: "There is the real possibility that the council may need to make a £15 million saving next year which could see the loss of services, and slashing the only meaningful exit strategy package prior to this saving is a train wreck waiting to happen.
"The reality of this means employees will not consider derisory voluntary exit packages in the coming years and with the threat of services being reduced or even stopped altogether, further savings will only be achieved through job cuts, if no one volunteers then there is only one alternative, compulsory redundancies."
He said the union is being treated with "contempt" and given "no opportunity" to negotiate the change.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here