A MAN who spent 25 years in prison for a crime he didn't commit has made fresh calls for sweeping changes to the criminal justice system which wrongly locked him up.
Robert Brown was convicted in 1977 for the murder of Annie Walsh after he was beaten into confessing to the unsolved crime.
On the 15th anniversary of his release in November of 2002, he has warned that there has been no reform to the system that locked him up.
The 60-year-old said: "I don't feel anything - I'm dead inside."
"How I feel doesn't matter. Pain is all I know. I live with it every day and I have to deal with it in my own way every day."
Mr Brown is a victim of one of Britain's worst miscarriages of justice, having spent 25 years in prison for a murder he didn't commit.
"I don't do this because I want self-pity", he said.
"I want changes to the criminal justice system that shows there's balance and equality for everybody.
"We need deep, radical change or you're going to hear cases like this for the next 25 years.
"It concerns me people are still getting convicted on hearsay evidence, character assassination and more - you would think a criminal justice system would have to be evidence based.
"I was convicted on the word of the police and juries believe police.
"Since I was released in 2002, there has not been any improvement in the justice system. I think police should be held responsible for their crimes.
"It's as if police are a law unto themselves.
"I don't believe we will get any changes until people march like they did against the Iraq war."
Robert grew up in a tenement in Kilbowie, Dunbartonshire, until the age of nine when he went into care in Quarriers, Inverclyde, until he was 15.
Four years later, he started a quarter century stretch in prison.
Annie Walsh, 51, was murdered in Manchester in 1977.
After months of the case sitting unsolved, Robert was picked up and he was beaten for two days until he confessed.
Most of the officers allegedly involved are now dead so Robert will never see them brought to justice.
In prison, he continued to profess his innocence, meaning the system wouldn't help him because he failed to accept his guilt.
Two officers were convicted in 1983 based on the Topping report into police corruption, including an investigator in Robert's case.
But the report was buried and the Home Office refused an appeal by Robert in 1994.
Yet it took less than an hour for the Court of Appeal to realise Robert's conviction was unsafe -- 10 years after the Home Office refused and nearly 20 after the investigation of police.
While Robert had been in jail, his father died, as did his sister, whose funeral he was refused the chance to attend.
He got out just in time to nurse his mother Margaret, who was dying of cancer.
He lived in the Knightswood area of Glasgow for a time after his release but later moved away from the area.
Though Robert was given compensation, the justice system then demanded more than £100,000 to pay for his prison living expenses.
"I'm angry and dislike the system for what it's done to me and done to other working class people.
"I didn't want money - money didn't give me justice.
"There are a lot of issues left unresolved. The real killer of Annie Walsh has not been caught. I'm passionate about getting the system changed.
"I think it's too late for me getting help and assistance for the damage done to me."
Robert says the people reading about court stories assume if an accused person makes no comment to police that they must have something to hide, even though it is their right not to speak.
"The public are quick to want to hang somebody without having any real knowledge of the facts or evidence of the case," he said.
"If there's no evidence to connect someone to the crime, then there's no case to answer.
"The word of one man or woman is not enough."
Paul McLaughlin, co-project manager of the Miscarriage of Justice Organisation (Mojo) in Glasgow, says all systems involving human beings are flawed.
And as the justice system works to increase convictions for rape and other sexual offences, many of them decades old, Paul says Mojo is concerned the standards for convictions are being relaxed.
He said: "Women and men deserve the right to be protected but you don't do that by lowering your standards.
"People must be believed but claims need to be backed by evidence.
"Anybody could be in Robert's shoes. A jury is a protection against convictions like Robert's - juries need to keep an open mind.
"Some criminals will get away - but we should not be lowering the standard just on the basis of a desire for justice. That's the danger of this rush to judgment."
Paul said they get up to 150 applications a year about possible miscarriages of justice in Scotland.
Mojo's desired overhauls include: declaring people innocent after a conviction is quashed; giving the same resources to help those leaving prison innocent as is offered to the guilty; and supporting wrongly convicted men and women with issues such as PTSD
Robert and Mojo will be visiting the UK Parliament later this month to show the film Fallout.
He adds that his story now is a bit like the nursery rhyme: All the king's horses and all the king's men, "nobody can put me together again".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel