THE Catholic Church in Scotland has claimed government moves to make it easier for young people to change their gender are “deeply disturbing” – insisting “our children deserve better”.
Anthony Horan, director of the Catholic Parliamentary Office, was responding to a Scottish Government plan that would allow children as young as 12 to decide their gender.
Mr Horan said that a 2015 study by Harvard paediatrics professor and epidemiologist Sari Reisner, and colleagues, showed transgender youths had an elevated risk of depression and suicide while it was separately claimed that certain treatments could cause infertility.
Agenda: Scottish Government's gender change proposals are a cause of great concern
Writing in The Herald today, Mr Horan said: “Perhaps most serious of all is the risk of lifelong infertility as sterility is inevitable when puberty blockers are followed by cross-sex hormones at an early stage of adolescent sexual development, or if pre-pubertal children are placed directly on these hormones, according to Dr Michelle Cretella of the American College of Paediatricians.
“Equalities Minister Angela Constance said the change was needed ‘to make sure transgender and non-binary people in Scotland were treated with dignity and respect’.
“The suggestion that 16 and 17-year-olds – never mind those as young as 12 – should pursue a change of gender at a time of their life fraught with confusion and vulnerability is deeply disturbing.”
He added: “These proposals should be considered thoughtfully, sensibly, and with considerable caution given these alarming statistics.
“In reality this is unlikely to happen.
“Their consultation may be supportive, but the Scottish Government will soon, to their long term cost, realise that public opinion is not.”
The comments by Mr Horan were challenged by James Morton, manager at Scottish Trans Alliance, who said accused the Catholic Parliamentary Office of misrepresenting research and science while "misleadingly" conflating a plan to simplify the process by which transgender people change their documentation with the medical treatments used to transition between genders.
Agenda: Scottish Government's gender change proposals are a cause of great concern
Mr Morton said: “The Scottish Government’s proposal is that 16 and 17 year olds should be allowed to change the gender marker on their birth certificate in the same way they can already change their gender marker on their other identity documents such as passports and bank cards.
“This would enable them to have privacy and dignity when they have to show their birth certificate to apply for work or university.
“It would have no impact on access to medical treatments – which will remain only available after careful assessment from NHS specialists.
“Incidentally, unbiased medical research evaluating over 30 years of puberty blocker use proves they are not a high risk treatment and do not harm fertility.”
He added: “The American College of Paediatricians is a tiny religious anti-LGBT group set up in 2002 as a protest against the large mainstream American Academy of Pediatrics’ support for adoption by gay couples.
“So it’s not a surprise that they dogmatically refuse to acknowledge the complex and varied development of sex characteristics and gender identity.
Agenda: Scottish Government's gender change proposals are a cause of great concern
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “One area we want to hear views on is whether to reduce the age young people can apply for legal gender recognition without parental involvement or consent from 18 to 16, making it consistent with other rights under the law such as getting married, entering a civil partnership or voting in Scottish elections.
“The consultation also asks whether it would be appropriate to consider expanding this right to under 16s and we will carefully consider the views of all respondents.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel