Ministers are considering offering Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe “diplomatic protection” as a possible way of speeding her release from jail in Iran, Downing Street has said.
Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe was arrested last year on a visit to her parents in Iran, and was handed a five-year sentence on allegations of spying and attempting to topple the Iranian regime. She was last week threatened with an extension to her jail term after Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson incorrectly claimed she had gone to the country to train journalists.
Her husband Richard Ratcliffe, who says his wife is on the verge of a nervous breakdown, has appealed to be allowed to join Mr Johnson on a trip to Iran planned by the end of the year, and to visit her in jail with the Foreign Secretary.
READ MORE: Johnson sorry for jailed Briton’s suffering but no apology for remarks
Mr Ratcliffe declined to join calls for Mr Johnson to resign over his gaffe, which was seized upon by Iranian judicial authorities as an admission of Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s guilt.
But he urged the Foreign Office to ensure that all ministers know that the Government position is that his wife was on holiday at the time of her arrest, after Environment Secretary Michael Gove said in a TV interview that he did not know what she was doing in Iran.
There was no immediate explanation from the Foreign Office of what “diplomatic protection” status could mean for Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe.
Mr Ratcliffe said that the idea was raised with him by Mr Johnson, telling BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “It feels now we do have the Foreign Secretary’s personal engagement. He did promise to consider whether she would be eligible for diplomatic protection. Which again gives a different aspect and a different push to what they will do for her.”
And Theresa May’s official spokesman said the diplomatic status was “one of the options” being considered in the case.
READ MORE: Johnson sorry for jailed Briton’s suffering but no apology for remarks
Mr Ratcliffe spoke to the Foreign Secretary amid calls for Mr Johnson to resign over his comments to a parliamentary committee, which he has already admitted “could have been clearer”.
Asked if the minister had apologised for the remarks, Mr Ratcliffe told ITV’s Good Morning Britain: “He was sorry for what Nazanin was going through, and for her suffering, and he said all of the country was behind her.”
Pressed on whether Mr Johnson said sorry for his comments, Mr Ratcliffe said: “He didn’t make the connection. He didn’t mention it.”
READ MORE: Johnson sorry for jailed Briton’s suffering but no apology for remarks
He said his family had been angered by Mr Gove’s claim, on BBC1’s Andrew Marr Show on Sunday, that he did not know what Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe was doing in Iran.
“Certainly there was all sorts of anger in our house,” said Mr Ratcliffe. “The Government’s position is that the Government is clear, and has no doubt, that she was there on holiday.
“I asked the Foreign Office to remind all of the Cabinet members that that’s the Government’s position.”
Mr Ratcliffe said it would not be helpful for the Foreign Secretary to resign over his handling of the case.
“I don’t think it’s helpful for Nazanin at this point,” he told Today. “I don’t think it’s helpful also in terms of how that looks in Iran for me to be looking like I’m playing politics.”
“It’s very important that the Iranians can see that this is just a family who are battling to bring Nazanin home, and not get the sort of sense that we are some sort of great Machiavellian power. We are not.”
Asked whether the Government would grant Mr Ratcliffe the possibility of visiting his wife in jail with Mr Johnson, Theresa May’s official spokesman said: “I think what we need to look at is what will work best and what can be most beneficial in this case. We will look at his comments very closely, and we will do whatever is the best course of action to secure her release.”
Following Mr Gove’s comments, the spokesman was asked whether the Prime Minister was aware of what Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe was doing in Iran.
“The Government’s position on this is clear,” he said. “She was there on holiday. It wasn’t for any other purpose.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel