AN EPIC legal battle over how much Scots pay for alcohol finally comes to a close this week, with the drinks industry accused of letting hundreds of people die during the process.
The UK Supreme Court will rule on Wednesday whether minimum unit pricing (MUP) can be introduced in Scotland, more than five years after MSPs approved the policy at Holyrood.
Intended to improve public health by linking the price of booze directly to its strength, the plan has been resisted every step of the way by the drinks industry.
The Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) has been the public face of the fight, although the biggest impact of MUP would be on cut-price strong ciders and vodkas.
A minimum price of 50p per unit of alcohol would mean a 12.5 per cent bottle of wine would cost at least £4.69, a bottle of strong cider at 5.3 per cent at least £4.67, and a 70cl bottle of 40 per cent whisky would be £14.
SNP ministers estimate it could save around 500 lives a year by reducing intake.
The drinks industry claims such pricing is “disproportionate as a matter of EU law”, and restricts the free movement of goods and impacts on the sale and marketing of wine.
However, as with Big Tobacco’s opposition to plain packaging, there are suspicions the drinks industry is trying to stop Scotland setting an example to the rest of the world.
Last year, after a reference to Europe over whether the plan restricted free trade, Scotland’s highest court ruled MUP was legally sound, but the SWA appealed to the Supreme Court.
Alison Douglas, chief executive of Alcohol Focus Scotland, said: “The SWA have pursued this case to the bitter end. They have relentlessly put the pursuit of profit over the health of Scots. Hundreds of Scots have lost their lives while they have done so. Let’s hope Scotland’s interests win out over those of global corporations.”
The SWA said the issue had always been about “the competitiveness of Scotch”.
A spokesman said: “The Scotch Whisky industry is the first to acknowledge that promoting responsible drinking and tackling alcohol-related harm is of paramount importance.
“Whatever the Supreme Court’s decision we will continue to work in partnership with the government and the voluntary section in order to do this.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel