A POLICE force is using social media to gauge public reaction to the controversial use of spit hoods.
In what is thought to be a first for Durham Police, it is carrying out a Twitter poll on whether it should start using the guards which are used to protect officers.
The tweet says: "We would like your views on 'Spit Hoods' and the potential for these to be used within force.
"A 'Spit Hood' is a restraint device intended to prevent an arrested individual from spitting or biting.
"Do you agree or disagree?"
With two hours on the poll left, 93% of the 1,200-plus voters were in favour.
One person replied: "I fully support the use of spit hoods as officers need protecting from this disgusting assault."
Another said: "People who disagree with using these obviously haven't been spat in the face by some dirty low life crook! Spitting is despicable! Hope the force starts using them to protect our officers."
An investigation last year found a third of forces used the mesh hoods.
Critics say they are distressing and humiliating for suspects and can cause panic.
They say the masks make more it difficult for officers to tell if someone is struggling to breathe.
An inspector made the suggestion of using a Twitter poll and Durham Police agreed to try it.
A spokesman said: "We value views and feedback - both positive and negative - as this helps us to identify the things we do well and also those areas where we need to improve.
"We have a huge social media following and so it seems fitting that we ask for public opinion in this way.
"A poll provides measurable results which can help to shape decisions.
"We are committed to delivering excellent policing to inspire confidence in victims and our communities by protecting neighbourhoods, tackling criminals and solving problems around the clock.
"This is shown in the force's 'outstanding' grading across all areas of efficiency for the third year running which has been announced today."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel