Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe has fired a vice president who had previously been seen as a likely successor, removing an obstacle to the presidential ambitions of Mr Mugabe’s wife.
Vice President Emmerson Mnangagwa was removed from office on Monday “with immediate effect”, the government said, opening the way to the possible appointment of Grace Mugabe to the post.
The 93-year-old president and his wife have in recent months accused Mr Mnangagwa of plotting to oust Zimbabwe’s leader, who has been in power since independence from white minority rule in 1980.
Mr Mnangagwa had been vice president since 2014 when his predecessor, Joice Mujuru, was fired for allegedly plotting to oust Mr Mugabe.
His dismissal was announced by Simon Khaya Moyo, the information minister.
Mr Mnangagwa was the most prominent of two vice presidents and had been part of Mr Mugabe’s cabinet since independence in 1980.
He is said to have enjoyed the support of military generals and war veterans.
His critics view him as ruthless because he was in charge of state security when Mr Mugabe unleashed a North Korean-trained brigade to crush dissent in western Zimbabwe in the 1980s.
At the weekend, both Mr Mugabe and his wife used political rallies to suggest that Mr Mnangagwa would be fired.
Speculation is now swirling over whether Grace Mugabe will be appointed to the vacant vice president’s post at a party congress next month.
On Sunday, she said at a rally that she was ready to take over from her husband.
“So I have said to the president: ‘You can also leave me in charge’,” she said.
“‘Give me the job and I will do it very well because I am good.
“I can do a great job’.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here