Around eight out of 10 foreign businesses with British interests are pessimistic about the outcome for the UK in the divorce talks with the European Union, polling has found.
Most firms (55%) believe Brexit will have a “negative” impact on their future investments in the UK, according to Ipsos Mori.
Just 8% said the vote to leave the bloc has had a positive effect on their company interests in Britain so far, compared with 54% who found it had been detrimental, while 36% said it had made no difference.
The survey of members of 13 foreign Chambers of Commerce, including the US, China, France and Germany, found 82% were either “not very” or “not at all confident” of a positive result for Britain in the exit talks compared with 13% who expressed optimism.
One in five (22%) firms believe the fall in their investment in the UK will be more than 10%, while only one in 10 think it will have a positive impact.
Nearly three-quarters (72%) put smooth access to the EU market for goods and services as a top priority for the talks.
Brian Gosschalk, head of the president’s office for Ipsos, said: “There have been a number of recent surveys of British business which reveal their concerns about the impact of Brexit.
“This new survey is noteworthy insofar as it covers businesses from 13 different countries, both from within and beyond the EU. Their views deserve careful consideration by key decision-makers.”
:: 1,046 members of 13 Chambers of Commerce with British interests took part in an online survey conducted by Ipsos Mori between October 7-21. The countries involved were Belgium, Canada, China, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, South Africa, Spain, Sweden and the US.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here