THE SNP Government has been accused of “a shocking lack of financial prudence” for pressing ahead with a controversial police merger without a full cost analysis.
Labour MSP Mary Fee levelled the charge at Nicola Sturgeon at First Minister’s Questions.
Ms Fee criticised the SNP’s plan for Police Scotland to take over the role and around 200 staff of the British Transport Police (BTP) from 2019.
The BTP is fiercely opposed to the move as are rail unions who fear it could weaken safety standards and jeopardise staff and passengers.
The TSSA transport union handed an 11,500-signature petition to ministers this week.
A recent leaked report from Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland (HMICS) also described the merger as an “entirely” political decision.
Ms Fee said papers released this week by the joint programme board overseeing the merger showed there was still no definitive information on the cost of the merger.
She said: “Does the First Minister agree that progressing the merger of the BTP and Police Scotland without doing a full cost analysis in the first instance demonstrates a shocking lack of financial prudence on the part of the Scottish Government?”
Disagreeing, Ms Sturgeon replied: “The merger of the British Transport Police, which has now been devolved to the Scottish Government - something that Labour supported in the context of the Smith commission - is being taken forward for three main reasons: to improve accountability; to ensure that the transport police have access to Police Scotland’s wider range of resources; and to future proof the transport police’s future governance."
She said the Tories had proposed absorbing BTP into "a bigger infrastructure police force" and if ministers did nothing BTP in Scotland would be "isolated" within it.
She added: "We will take forward the proposals sensibly and responsibly... and we will continue to work with those employed in the British Transport Police to ensure that we take account of all their concerns as we go forward."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel