The head of Britain’s financial watchdog has warned that the value of a Brexit transition period will start “eroding” by the start of 2018 as banks introduce “irreversible” contingency plans by the start of the new year.
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) chief executive Andrew Bailey told MPs on Tuesday that firms are unlikely to back-pedal once they start relocating staff to the EU, or hiring new employees on the continent.
“They are already taking positions … for instance, they’re renting buildings in places at the moment. I think they would regard those sorts of decisions as essentially fairly reversible,” Mr Bailey told the Treasury Select Committee.
“I think where it really starts to get more irreversible or at least harder – and this is what they all tell me – is in terms of staff, and that is two parts: one is either relocating staff or hiring staff.”
He said firms were very conscious of the Brexit deadline at the end of March 2019 and would have to take action “in advance”, either by persuading staff to move abroad, or by recruiting in labour markets that are “often much tighter for skills they want” than what they currently encounter in the UK.
“So that is why they – and we – tend to take the view that the end of this year, beginning of next year, is the point at which these things start happening.
FCA boss Andrew Bailey appeared in front of the Treasury Select Committee on Tuesday (PA)
“Each firm will no doubt give you a slightly different date if you push for precision, but I think that’s the sort of date to have in mind when things start to happen that have much bigger consequences,” Mr Bailey said.
It echoes comments by the head of Germany’s financial regulator Felix Hufeld, who warned last week that City firms were nearing the “point of no return”, which he said will be “somewhere around early next year”.
Mr Bailey noted that most banks were preparing for Brexit on the likelihood that no deal will be reached with the EU.
“You can call it hard Brexit, you can call it no deal, but there is no inbuilt assumption that something good happens in this negotiation that in a sense, that, you know, saves the day.”
It comes amid reports that the Bank of England is currently operating under the assumption that up to 75,000 jobs could move from the UK as a result of Brexit.
The BBC, which first reported the figure, said that the number was subject to the outcome of Brexit negotiations.
In a wide-ranging committee hearing, Mr Bailey spoke at length about the financial watchdog’s investigation into Royal Bank of Scotland’s treatment of small businesses which were shifted into its controversial Global Restructuring Group (GRG).
RBS chief executive Ross McEwan has written to MPs outlining a number of “concerns” over the methodology and approach of the FCA’s interim report, which identified a number of failings at the bank.
The state-backed lender has been dogged by allegations that it intentionally pushed businesses towards failure in the hopes of picking up their assets on the cheap.
“The bank does not agree that the evidence relied upon by the Skilled Person substantiates the key finding that the bank is guilty of ‘widespread inappropriate treatment of customers’,” Mr McEwan said in his letter, adding that there was no distinction drawn between process failings and conduct failings.
Mr Bailey told MPs that the bank should have accepted its findings, and blamed those disputes for delaying the release date of the interim report.
“I think the report is strongly critical of RBS and I think it is, frankly, unfortunate that RBS have not in a sense accepted that, I think, more readily,” Mr Bailey said.
“I think they should do, because a lot of … time and a lot of effort and a lot of work has been done on this.”
The FCA said it is still investigating RBS.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel