A former Conservative junior minister has said people need to learn how to reject advances at work "without upsetting people".
Edwina Currie, junior health minister in the 80s, said the sexual harassment allegations surfacing at Westminster and Holyrood were based on "flimsy" evidence.
She told the BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme: "Most politicians, most of the time are just concentrating on their job and the evidence, such as it is, is not only quite flimsy but also it goes back a long, long time."
She said it should be acceptable for people to "make a pass" at work and people had to learn how to deal with it appropriately, adding: "This is an attempt to shame all sorts of people who have done absolutely nothing wrong."
"The workplace, these days, is where people meet. It's where many romances and liaisons get developed. You can't ban it from the workplace.
"You have to learn the language of making the approach and you have to learn the language of repelling it without upsetting people and without creating an atmosphere."
She added: "When you have people who are in a position of power...then you are in a completely different situation, especially when you a very big gap in the ability of the individuals to control the situation.
"We're talking about something much more trivial here, which can sometimes be a misunderstanding. It can sometimes just be someone making a pass at someone."
She added: "We're not in Victorian times, we're not weak little victims. If anyone had ever tried anything on, whether it was in the House of Commons or anywhere else, and they were being persistent and a pest I would have made it quite clear to him he would leave bent double."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel