Scottish Tory MPs have joined calls for Philip Hammond to cut tax on Scotch whisky at next month's Budget.
Douglas Ross, Kirstene Hair and Bill Grant suggested cutting duty could actually increase the tax take for the Treasury, amid warnings a tax rise has coincided with one million fewer bottles of Scotch being sold.
Treasury minister Andrew Jones said the Government would continue to support the industry, but warned the Chancellor was facing tough choices over the public finances ahead of the Budget.
Speaking in a Westminster Hall debate on the future of the Scottish whisky industry, Moray MP Mr Ross said: "On the point of taxation, would he agree with me that the Treasury should actually be looking at the benefits of reducing the taxation, because actually the Scotch Whisky Association, with the independent back-up of KPMG, have actually shown that by reducing the duty on Scotch whisky, you increase the revenues going to the Treasury."
Angus MP Ms Hair added: "We have the fourth highest excise rate in the EU.
"Other EU countries do support their home industries, and I think we too, even more so now, need to follow suit."
Mr Grant (Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock), meanwhile, said reducing corporation tax had been successful in increasing the tax take.
"We're minded to further reduce the corporation tax to achieve the same role," he added.
"Do you think that would also apply to the reduction in duty on spirits, and maybe generate an increased tax take as per the corporation tax?"
Liberal Democrat MP Alistair Carmichael, a former Scottish secretary who led the debate, said March's Budget had brought in an increase of 3.9% in spirits duty, with a 3.4% increase forecast at the end of this month and a further 3% per year thereafter.
"It's something of a super tax which I would suggest to the minister is ill-conceived, misguided and really does require some quite urgent consideration," Mr Carmichael said.
"The increase in March did damage confidence.
"It has led to a sharp decrease, a million bottles fewer sold in the first two quarters of this year compared to last year."
Mr Jones said figures from the Scotch Whisky Association estimated the industry earns around £5 billion for the UK economy and supports more than 40,000 jobs, 7,000 of which are in the rural economy.
"It is a fantastic success story and one for our UK to be proud of," he added.
"We will continue to support the Scotch whisky industry, so that it continues to thrive and prosper."
Mr Jones went on: "As we approach the Budget, I have to say that the Government does face some pretty tough choices.
"I can't really pre-empt what the Chancellor may announce, but I must just point out that it is the Government's policy and the public finances assume that alcohol duties will rise by RPI (retail price index) each year."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel