A WOMAN whose mother died after contracting a flesh-eating bug at Wishaw General Hospital is suing the health board for negligence over a claim that bungles with her drainage tube led to the fatal infection.
Sharon Boyle, 45, from Motherwell, claims that her mother's care was blighted by a "catalogue of errors" which culminated in her death.
She said she wants to make sure that no other family has to experience what she went through in the days before her mother, Lorraine Dickson, died in October 2011 aged 72 after developing necrotising fasciitis. The civil damages case against NHS Lanarkshire is due to be heard at Hamilton Sheriff Court in December.
Mrs Boyle, a podiatrist and mother-of-three, said: "I haven't had a chance to grieve my mum's death for six years because this case has been going on. My mum has got to have died for a reason, and if something changes for other patients then at least the pain and suffering she went through will have been worth something. No one else should have to see their mother suffering the way I did."
Mrs Dickson, who had relapsed breast cancer, was admitted to Wishaw General in September 2011 after developing a build up of fluid in her abdominal cavity - known as malignant ascites. The condition was a complication linked to her cancer, and the fluid had to be drained using a tube inserted through Mrs Dickson's side into her abdomen.
Read more: Model who lost both legs to flesh-eating bug fights for disabled rights
Mrs Dickson, a former nurse and secretary who had lost her husband to Alzheimer's disease eight months before her breast cancer was diagnosed as having returned, was said by Mrs Boyle to have been "very fit" despite the disease.
She said: "She was up and about, walking, talking to people, eating her meals. She was asking me to bring in Christmas catalogues so that she could plan what presents to buy for her grandchildren."
However, during her admission Mrs Dickson developed E. coli, which progressed into necrotising fasciitis - an extremely deadly bacterial infection which rapidly destroys soft tissues.
Mrs Boyle said: "The infection had spread from underneath her right breast to the top of her thigh. I was told that if they had tried to remove the tissue surgically, it would have looked like a 'shark bite'. I was told she probably wouldn't last 24 hours, but my mum was a fighter. She survived another 10 days."
Mrs Dickson died on October 22 2011, and necrotising fasciitis was cited as the number one cause of death on her death certificate.
The case rests on the claim that the drainage tube was left in too long - four days rather than six hours - and re-inserted after falling onto a bathroom floor at the hospital, and that this is what led Mrs Dickson to contract E coli and subsequently necrotising faciitis.
However, NHS Lanarkshire deny liability for Mrs Dickson's death. Lawyers for the health board argue that there were conflicting views on how to manage chest drains at that time, and that in the absence of any clear guidelines NHS Lanarkshire cannot be blamed for negligence.
They also say that it cannot be proven that the chest drain was the cause of the E. coli infection which triggered necrotising fasciitis. Infections are a common risk factor of ascites drainage, occurring in around 20 per cent of cases, and contracting an infection does not in itself mean that the drain was incorrectly inserted.
Read more: Girl recovers after battle with flesh-eating bug
Mrs Boyle said: "I knew my mother was going to die. If she had died of cancer I could have accepted it. But she died too soon, and she died from an infection which she should never have had."
Gillian McAuley, Wishaw General Hospital chief of nursing services, said: “We are unable to comment on any civil legal action against NHS Lanarkshire in relation to this case as legal proceedings are ongoing.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel