THE illegal spying operation linked to the unsolved murder of Emma Caldwell is one of the grubbiest episodes in Police Scotland's short and far from less illustrious history.
After the press exposed the failings of the original Strathclyde Police investigation into the young prostitute’s killing, the single force should have read the media coverage carefully and immediately ordered a fresh manhunt.
Instead the Counter Corruption Unit embarked on a mole-hunt that involved seizing the mobile phone data of serving and retired officers suspected of involvement in the leak.
However, not only were the suspicions entirely groundless, but the snooping operations were unlawful.
The illegal spy applications led to Holyrood hearings, triggered an Investigatory Powers Tribunal and produced grovelling apologies to the individuals wrongly targeted.
Two points about this farce need to be made. The first is that the fallout from this scandal has been a huge distraction from the real issue of finding Caldwell’s killer.
A vulnerable woman was murdered, but when flaws in the original investigation were made public Police Scotland focused on the leaks. This was unforgivable and has led to an enormous amount of energy being directed on a side issue.
The second point is the treatment of the serving and retired officers. David Moran, who we interviewed today, was a highly respected detective who was treated appallingly by the force.
If this is how the force treats one of its own, how does Police Scotland behave towards ordinary members of the public? The CCU has behaved disgracefully - and it is time the officers responsible were held to account.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here