UK Environment Secretary Michael Gove faced a furious backlash on social media after claiming being interviewed by BBC Radio 4 presenter John Humphrys was like "going into Harvey Weinstein's bedroom".
The MP apologised for the "clumsy" on-air joke referring to disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein.
Former Labour leader Lord Kinnock was also facing demands for an apology after he joined in the joke, saying Humphrys' interview technique was "way past groping".
Gove said in a tweet: "Apologies for my clumsy attempt at humour on R4 Today this morning – it wasn't appropriate. I'm sorry and apologise unreservedly."
The minister was being interviewed by Humphrys in front of a live audience for a special 60th anniversary edition of Radio 4's flagship Today programme.
Asked what it was like appearing on the programme, Gove replied: "Sometimes I think going into the studio with you John is a bit like going into Harvey Weinstein's bedroom. You just pray you emerge with your dignity intact."
Kinnock, who was being interviewed alongside him, joined in, saying: "John goes way past groping. Way past groping."
Several people took to Twitter to condemn the remarks, including Labour MP Jess Phillips, who wrote: "Michael Gove just left the studio without his dignity."
Shadow education secretary Angela Rayner said Gove was "not funny" adding: "Given current sensitivities (it) is beyond poor judgement – it's crass."
Singer Lily Allen called the MP a "bonehead" while actor Stephen Mangan wrote: "Morning. Here's a rape joke from Michael Gove to start your day."
Others called for Kinnock to apologise, with one listener writing: "Sexual violence is no punchline".
Radio 2 presenter Jeremy Vine tweeted: "Neil Kinnock's reaction to the Harvey Weinstein joke by Michael Gove is the strangest thing about it."
The row erupted at a time when the conduct of MPs is under intense scrutiny in the wake of the allegations about Weinstein, who is accused of harassing and assaulting dozens of women. He denies claims of non-consensual sex.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel