THERESA May’s Government has been accused of showing “contempt” and “utter disdain” for the UK Parliament after it announced that a minister would respond within 12 weeks to any Opposition motion in the Commons supported by MPs.
The announcement by Andrea Leadsom, the Commons Leader, comes after a wave of Government abstentions on motions tabled by Labour, which were subsequently passed by MPs unopposed. The motions are non-binding and do not require any change in policy by ministers.
Last week, Labour forced a vote on a motion calling for a pause in the rollout of Universal Credit, which was backed by 299 votes to none. Other votes in recent weeks on issues such as social care and the public sector pay cap have been passed without opposition by the Government.
In light of the Universal Credit vote, John Bercow, the Commons Speaker, demanded the Government explain how it planned to proceed in such future circumstances.
Ms Leadsom explained the 12-week period was proposed to “allow thoughtful consideration” of points raised and for collective discussion across Government.
Pete Wishart, the SNP’s Shadow Leader, branded Ms Leadsom’s statement “woeful” and mocked how ministers would make an urgent response to a vote “within a 12-week period”.
“Instead of a statement months later, why not just get the Government to agree what this House has democratically agreed with its votes,” he added.
Christine Jardine, the LibDem Scotland spokeswoman said: “This is the latest example of a Conservative government who are showing utter disdain for Parliament.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel