Ashley Judd has spoken for the first time since she accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual harassment, saying she tried to bargain with the producer so she could escape his hotel room.
The actress was one of the first high profile women to make allegations against the mogul, opening the floodgates for more than 60 others to come forward.
In an interview with Diane Sawyer on US network ABC, Judd said she went to a hotel in 1997 for what she thought was a breakfast meeting with Weinstein.
.@AshleyJudd on Harvey Weinstein encounter: “If I could go back retrospectively with a magic wand…I wish I could prevent it for anyone.” pic.twitter.com/1NbOgJELeM
— Good Morning America (@GMA) October 26, 2017
Once in the room, the actress said he began pressuring her to give and receive massages and to watch him shower.
She said: “There’s this constant grooming, negotiation going on. I thought no meant no. I fought with this volley of nos, which he ignored.
“Maybe he heard them as maybe, maybe he heard them as yeses. Maybe they turned him on.”
.@AshleyJudd to @DianeSawyer on Harvey Weinstein encounter: “I thought no meant no…I fought with this volley of no’s.” pic.twitter.com/2QDO0mAa2p
— Good Morning America (@GMA) October 26, 2017
In a bid to get out of the bathroom, Judd said she resorted to striking a deal with him.
She told Sawyer: “He just kept coming at me with all this other stuff. Finally, I just said ‘When I win an Oscar in one of your movies, OK?’
“He said ‘When you get nominated’. I said ‘No, when I win an Oscar’. And then I just fled.”
She added: “I think, you know, am I proud of that? I’m of two minds. The part that shames myself says no. The part of me that understands the way shame works says ‘that was absolutely brilliant, good job, kid. You got out of there. Well done’.”
“It’s a very important word, shame, and it’s a very important thing to talk about, so we all do the best we can and our best is good enough. And it’s really okay to have responded however we responded.”
Judd said nobody had ever warned her about Weinstein before she went for the meeting, but said: “I remember the lurch when I went to the (hotel) desk and I said, ‘Mr Weinstein, is he on the patio?’ And they said ‘He’s in his room’, and I was like ‘Oh, you’re kidding me?'”
.@AshleyJudd to @DianeSawyer on Harvey Weinstein encounter: "I fought with this volley of no’s…I don’t know that I'd have been believed." pic.twitter.com/J4G6inRJ1R
— Good Morning America (@GMA) October 26, 2017
She told Sawyer she went up to his room because they had a business appointment, adding: “Which is his pattern of sexual predation, that was how he rolled.”
Judd said she wished she could “go back with a magic wand, I wish I could prevent it for anyone, always.”
She added: “I don’t know that I would have been believed and who was I to tell? I knew it was disgusting. Was I going to tell the concierge who sent me up to the room?”
Questioned about a photograph of Judd and Weinstein at an Oscar party after the meeting, obtained from Weinstein’s team, the actress denied it proves they were on friendly terms.
She said: “No. That’s deny, attack, reverse the order of offender and victim.”
In another photo from that same party, Weinstein is pictured holding Judd’s hand. She said: “I hoped I didn’t pass him, but I did, and he obviously grabbed my hand.
“The look on my face is abject terror. I can see it in my eyes. It’s very gross. It’s very gross. I feel for that 28, 29-year-old woman.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here