The administrator for collapsed airline Monarch is seeking a judicial review to allow it to sell the ill-fated carrier’s take-off and landing slots.
KPMG has faced questions over whether it is legally permitted to sell the slots as part of attempts to recoup cash for creditors, and on Thursday said it will initiate court action.
Blair Nimmo, partner at KPMG and joint administrator, said: “Given the complexity of the slot exchange process, we are seeking a judicial review on this particular matter.
“In addition to assisting the joint administrators fulfil their statutory duties, we believe this to be in the wider public interest, with the intention of resolving this matter quickly and with the greatest chance of maximising the continued use of the slots.”
Monarch, which was owned by private equity firm Greybull Capital, collapsed last month, leading to 1,858 workers being made redundant and the flights and holidays of about 860,000 people being cancelled.
Greybull cited a highly-competitive market, terrorism and the plunge in the value of the pound as factors leading to its demise.
KPMG is attempting to offload Monarch’s assets, with its take-off and landing slots by far the most valuable.
Jet2, Norwegian Air Shuttle, IAG, Wizz Air and easyJet are all understood to be vying for the slots, which span Manchester, Gatwick, Birmingham, Luton and Leeds-Bradford.
Separately, Greybull has come under heavy fire from MP Frank Field, who has claimed the group could walk away with millions from the wreckage.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here