MSPs have backed the Scottish Government’s fracking ban in a parliamentary vote.
Energy Minister Paul Wheelhouse announced earlier this month planning regulations would be used to “effectively ban” the controversial gas extraction technique by extending the current moratorium “indefinitely”.
Speaking in a Parliamentary debate, he said the vote gives parliament the opportunity to endorse the government’s “carefully considered and robust decision”.
The Conservatives branded the ban “ludicrous” and “anti-science” while Labour, the Greens and the Liberal Democrats called for it to be incorporated into the national planning framework, making it harder for any future governments to overturn.
Hydraulic fracturing involves injecting high pressure water into shale formations, fracturing the rock to release natural gas, and has been opposed by all parties, except the Conservatives.
Opponents have raised concerns over the impact on health and the environment, while supporters highlight the economic benefits and claim regulation could mitigate any adverse effects.
Mr Wheelhouse said 99% of respondents to a public consultation backed the ban and government-commissioned research “does not provide a strong enough basis from which to address these communities’ concerns”.
He said: “The Scottish Government has concluded it is in the public interest to say no to fracking. The steps we have taken have given immediate effect to this position.”
He added the approach chosen prevents “unnecessary legislation”.
Tory Murdo Fraser said: “In relation to the SNP’s ludicrous ban on fracking on Scotland it is difficult to know which aspect of this is worst.
“Is it this government’s abandonment of evidence-led policy making? Is it it’s contempt for science? Or the sheer hypocrisy from a party that in the past has been happy to champion Scotland’s hydrocarbon industry but now simply wants us to reply in imports of fracked gas from elsewhere in the world, wherever that may be?”
Currently, the Ineos refinery at Grangemouth processes US shale gas shipments and Mr Fraser said the ban means Scotland uses shale gas but “misses out” on the economic benefits of producing it.
Mr Fraser accused the government of “ignoring” 2014 research it commissioned indicating fracking could be carried out “safely” and claimed they were “dancing to the tune of the Green Party”.
Labour’s Claudia Beamish was clear fracking is “unwanted technology” which was “incompatible with Scotland’s future as a green and progressive nation”.
She said: “The long term damage outweighs any short term value that might be gained - a value which has been significantly over inflated by the industry.”
Writing the ban into the national planning framework would mean there would have to be a vote in Holyrood before the ban could be lifted, so it could not be “changed on a ministerial whim”, she added.
Green MSP Mark Ruskell said the debate and vote in Holyrood marked an “historic moment” for Scotland with the shift away from fossil fuels but added: “It’s time to put in place a water tight ban with a firm basis in planning law.”
He said: “The risk that the fracking technologies pose to the climate and to communities far outweigh the economic benefits they could ever deliver. It’s just not worth it.”
Meanwhile Liberal Democrat Liam McArthur said the government’s approach was the “best way of implementing an immediate and effective ban” on fracking but called for it to be included in the planning framework.
MSPs voted by 91 to 28 for the ban.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article