A TRAMS director warned against "opening the whole can of worms" by moving to tackle stumbling blocks ahead of signing the critical contract deal for the botched project in the Scottish capital.
It was revealed that "not a single design element" of the Edinburgh trams system had been agreed just weeks before the contract with the main contractor was to be signed in 2008, five years after the project began.
Read more: Edinburgh Trams’ green gain blasted as only one per cent pollution cut along route
The Edinburgh Tram Inquiry before Lord Hardie heard senior officials had considered in emails whether to outline potential problems before the contract was signed or after.
Steven Bell, former Tie director, was pressed by Lord Hardie over the "prudence" of broaching hundreds of logistical and engineering hurdles timeously and he confirmed they had decided on “a bit of both”.
Read more: Edinburgh Trams’ green gain blasted as only one per cent pollution cut along route
The questioning of Mr Bell was set against the background of spiralling costs and undecided design issues from the early stages of the project.
At its inception in 2003 the price of the tram system was put at £375 million, by the time contract was signed in May 2008 this had risen to £545m, but by 2014 when the trams started running - three years late - the final bill was £776m.
The inquiry heard Tie executives considered whether to move to tackle outstanding issues before the contract was signed or leave this until later.
The level of uncertainty over possible stumbling blocks was highlighted at the inquiry where the nature of the contract is under scrutiny.
Instead of 60-100 potential problems that might have been expected on the project, there were 800 issues of concern, ranging from roadworks to providing tram stops, documents put before the inquiry showed.
Mr Bell was quizzed on a 2008 email from Tie colleague Jim McEwan, and it appeared the council was not told about the Bilfinger Berger Siemens consortium report that detailed concerns over the lack of any agreement on the design of the project, now being probed at the behest of former First Minister Alex Salmond.
Read more: Edinburgh Trams’ green gain blasted as only one per cent pollution cut along route
Mr McEwan, who was employed by Tie as a consultant/contractor between May 2007 and November 2009 as Business Improvement Director, wrote to Mr Bell that "my view is that if we pursue (advisor's) steer on this we will open up the whole can of worms on the Infraco contract cost overall, and that we have to take on the chin that the programme version is not consistent, get the deal signed and then fight the notified departure tooth and nail.
"I understand (advisor's) point but if we are at all hopeful of getting this done by the 15th April (this year) we cannot take his suggested approach."
The 2008 BBS report stated that in 2005 Tie set up a design agreement but by 2007 this plan showed "significant slippages", adding: "Consequently, no design element has been issued for construction."
Mr McEwan had written in his statement to the inquiry that he was "offered a contract role which was termed 'Business Improvement Director' but I was not a Director, nor a permanent employee, adding: "I had no signing authority in the role."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel