POLICE forces, like all major institutions, must reflect the diversity of the citizens they serve.
However, Police Scotland appears to be failing on this front with black and minority ethnic communities.
According to 2016 data, only 1% of police have a BME background. By contrast, the 2011 census estimated that 4% of Scotland’s population was from a “minority ethnic” group.
The Coalition for Racial Equality and Rights (CRER) has defined the low levels of BME staff in Police Scotland as an example of institutional racism.
The CRER also says this phrase applies to retention levels of BME staff and the way in which racist complaints are dealt with by police.
According to the CRER, the “problem of institutional racism” within the force has to be “named and acknowledged” before it can be addressed.
Police Scotland, to its credit, says that all officers undertake compulsory diversity and equality training and insists the force has a “good working relationship” with the CRER.
Over the last few months, Police Scotland has also staged a series of new BME engagement initiatives with potential recruits.
However, for a force that has been marked by poor leadership and weak financial stewardship, an allegation of “institutional racism” is another serious blow.
Quotas can be a blunt tool, but perhaps some form of positive discrimination must now be considered to enforce diversity in the police.
As a matter of urgency, Police Scotland must now lay out additional measures to become more diverse and address the points raised by the charity.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here