National Trust members are voting on proposals to ban legal “trail hunting” on the organisation’s land.
Members who have put forward the resolution calling on the National Trust not to permit trail hunting – in which a scent is laid for hounds and the hunt to follow – say the practice is allowing illegal hunting of foxes, deer and other animals with dogs.
They have also raised concerns about damage from hunting to wider wildlife and landscapes on Trust land in England and Wales.
I support calls for an end to hunting on #nationaltrust land. Fingers crossed for the AGM on Saturday @LeagueACS https://t.co/MEwGxVizn7
— Alex Norris (@ANorrisMP) October 16, 2017
But the charity’s board of trustees said new measures are being brought in for licensing legal hunts, including forbidding laying fox-based scents which can lead to foxes being accidentally hunted.
As well as meeting its conservation aims, the National Trust should look for ways to “welcome people and to work to accommodate users from as broad a range of constituencies as possible” on its land, the trustees said.
They said the revised process for licensing trail hunts would allow the Trust to meet both aims, and have urged members to vote against the resolution at the charity’s annual general meeting in Swindon on Saturday.
Since the ban on hunting with dogs came into force in 2005, the National Trust has licensed legal trail hunting on its land as one of number of activities it allows.
The Trust said it monitored the activities it licensed and over the last five years had taken action against trail hunts on six occasions.
National Trust members expected to vote in huge numbers for a ban on Trail Hunting at AGM on Saturday pic.twitter.com/VpAcyVEycb
— Badger Trust (@BadgerTrust) October 20, 2017
Last year 79 licences were issued to 67 hunts for use of National Trust land.
Anti-hunt campaigners are gathering outside the AGM to support the vote to ban trail hunting, exempt hunting and exercising hounds on Trust land.
Philippa King, acting chief executive of the League Against Cruel Sports, said: “The National Trust claims no illegal hunting takes place on their land but we believe they are either being deceived or not paying attention.”
She said the League Against Cruel Sports had produced more than 400 pages of reports and evidence to support the motion.
We hope the #NationalTrust listens to its members,who have heard from our supporters & voted on the ban on hunting https://t.co/4EhnGklKBA pic.twitter.com/95YgkmsKNl
— The League (@LeagueACS) October 15, 2017
“The National Trust is a treasured institution which does wonderful work, but it has allowed itself to be embarrassed by the hunting fraternity. Sadly the National Trust is encouraging its members not to support the motion.”
But a spokeswoman for the Countryside Alliance said: “There is no evidence to suggest that hunts are breaking the law – there has not been a single successful prosecution of a hunt trail-hunting across National Trust land since the inception of the Hunting Act in February 2005.
“The National Trust was set up exactly to preserve the cultural heritage of our country that hunts represent.
“From Cumbria to Cornwall hunts have been an intrinsic part of rural life for hundreds of years and they remain just that.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel