A TOP private school in Glasgow has lobbied MSPs in a bid to halt proposals to end a lucrative system of tax breaks for the fee-paying sector.
Hutchesons’ Grammar, which charges £11,728 a year for its services, has asked for a statement of support from them while the Government considers scrapping tax relief on their properties.
The school’s rector and chair of governors also claimed that the independent sector saves the taxpayer money on account of parents not using their state school places.
However, Green MSP Patrick Harvie said: “Private schools are always keen to argue that they benefit the whole of society, but the benefit they create goes overwhelmingly to the wealthiest, increasing inequality in our society and diminishing the diversity of taxpayer-funded schools which are run as a genuine public service.”
He added: "I don’t think there’s any reasonable basis for such institutions of privilege to enjoy charitable status or the tax advantages that come with it."
Private schools enjoy a suite of tax breaks worth millions of pounds every year on account of being classified as charities.
The schools get a mandatory 80 per cent discount off their non-domestic rates (NDR) bill – levied on properties – but the tax reduction has been called into question by a Government-commissioned review into the entire rates system.
The Barclay review stated: “Independent (private) schools that are charities also benefit from reduced or zero rates bills, whereas council (state) schools do not qualify and generally will pay rates. This is unfair and that inequality should end by removing eligibility for charity relief from all independent schools.”
Ministers are mulling over the proposal, but many private schools are alarmed at what they believe is a threat to their finances.
In their letter, Colin Gambles and Ruth Walker – two of the most senior figures at Hutchesons’ Grammar – claim that the review “threatened” the sector with “considerable economic repercussions” and asked for the support of MSPs.
They argued that the rationale behind the review is “flawed” as private schools have already passed the “charity test” overseen by a watchdog.
Gambles and Walker also claimed that parents pay for their child’s state-provided education, but “do not take the place available to them”, adding:
“The education of each child in the independent sector saves the Scottish tax payer £6,525 per senior pupil per year and £4,667 per primary pupil per year. The Barclay Review threatens this saving to the public purse as more children would have to return to state-provided education.”
The pair also claimed that the “unintended consequences” of the plan would be “deeply damaging” to the education of young people and asked for a “statement of support in your considered response to this letter”.
A spokesperson for the Educational Institute of Scotland, a trade union that represents teachers, said: “The EIS has long believed that independent schools benefitting from charitable status while state schools do not is inequitable and in need of review. The fact that state schools, which provide educational opportunities to young people of all backgrounds, pay higher rates than fee-paying schools is something that is difficult to justify.
“This does not automatically mean that the removal of the rate subsidy is required but a degree of equity between the sectors would be welcome.”
Ending the tax break is likely to depend on the SNP Government supporting the review proposal.
The Greens are against private schools’ tax advantages, while Labour has said that it “cannot be right” the schools receive charitable relief. However, the parties do not command a majority at Holyrood.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel