TWO men who killed a family's pet geckos in a "sickening" act are behind bars after failing to show they are truly remorseful.
Daniel Innes, 20, and Jordan McIsaac, 18, killed the two lizards in Amanda Bibby’s house in Aberchirder, Aberdeenshire in March last year.
One of the geckos fell to his death and the other one was shredded in a kitchen blender.
Ms Bibby, 33, returned home to find her house wrecked – with Innes, of Inverurie, in Aberdeenshire, also causing thousands of pounds of damage during a rampage at the property.
The men admitted the crime but sentence was deferred for three months to allow them to prove they were "truly remorseful" and wanted to make amends for their crime.
However, when the pair appeared at Banff Sheriff Court yesterday, Sheriff Philip Mann told them that he was in a “difficult position” after listening to their solicitors' explanations of their actions over the previous three months.
He stressed that he had initially deferred the case against them to give them the chance to demonstrate that a non-custodial sentence might be appropriate.
He added: “But for that to work it really would need 100 per cent commitment and I’m not satisfied that you have shown that 100 per cent commitment.”
The two men had filmed the killings with a mobile phone during a house party while Ms Bibby was away on a weekend break.
The sheriff remanded both men and warned that custody could be likely when they returned for their sentence in two weeks.
Innes’s solicitor had explained that his client had not been aware of a social work appointment arranged to complete background reports previously requested by the court.
He said his client had changed address and had contacted him on Monday to let him know the report would not be prepared in time for the hearing yesterday.
The sheriff had previously advised the men to think of a way to demonstrate that they regretted their actions towards the animals.
And he suggested that they contact the Scottish SPCA animal welfare charity to ask if there was anything they could do to make amends for their behaviour.
Defence lawyer Stuart Beveridge said Innes had sent emails to organisations but “pretty much everyone” rejected his offer.
The court heard that both men had since donated money to the Scottish SPCA.
Mr Mann asked if Innes had paid any compensation to the family whose house was trashed.
But Mr Beveridge said: “At the moment, he’s not in any position to make any meaningful compensation to them.
“That is something he intends to do when he’s in a position to do so.”
The sheriff also noted that his co-accused had been told to carry out a fiscal work order but had not carried out the requirements of the order since July.
McIsaac, of Banff, looked shocked when Mr Mann remanded him yesterday.
He also appeared on a separate case of assaulting a man on Low Street in Banff on August 24 last year.
He previously pleaded guilty to the offence and the sheriff deferred sentence until the same date, warning that a custodial sentence could also be imposed.
Sentence was deferred until October 31.
Following the hearing, Ms Bibby, who broke down in tears when the men were remanded, said: “I think the sheriff had restored my faith in the justice system.
“Obviously we will have to wait for the outcome but we are just happy they are getting meaningful punishment.
“I was absolutely gobsmacked, in shock.
“I didn’t expect it.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel