RICHARD Leonard has emerged as the clear favourite to lead Scottish Labour among party branches, as infighting worsens amid allegations of a “rigged” contest.
The left-wing MSP was nominated by 43 constituency Labour parties (CLPs), compared to 16 for centrist Anas Sarwar.
Mr Leonard, a former GMB official, also picked up almost every trade union endorsement.
He was backed by ten unions including Unite, Unison, Usdaw, CWU, GMB Scotland, Aslef and the TSSA, as well as by the Scottish Co-operative Party and Scottish Young Labour.
Mr Sarwar was supported by just one union, the small centre-right outfit Community.
The leadership race was yesterday rocked by an accusation from Labour MP Ian Murray, a supporter of Mr Sarwar, that it was being “rigged” in support of Mr Leonard.
The Edinburgh South MP, who quit as shadow Scottish Secretary last year over Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, complained to Scottish Labour HQ about a recruitment drive by Unite.
Unite called on him to “withdraw his baseless smears” and said it was concerned at “repeated and underhand efforts to bring this election and our union into disrepute".
Mr Murray’s allegation followed claims of high numbers of new Asian members being signed up for the vote, with some sharing common contact details and email addresses.
The contest, one of the dirtiest political scraps in recent times, still has five weeks left to run, with the winner announced on November 18.
Mr Leonard’s nominations included most of the CLPs in Mr Sarwar’s home turf of Glasgow.
However Mr Sarwar was backed by Mr Leonard’s local CLP in Paisley and by 96 councillors to Mr Leonard’s 85.
Mr Leonard said: “Let’s conduct this debate in a comradely fashion, and ensure the Scottish Labour Party is strengthened and better able to advance and deliver real change for people.”
Mr Sarwar said: "There are two weeks before ballot papers land. I will be travelling the country to listen to the Labour movement about how we put our values at the heart of Scotland's future."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel