THE Scottish Labour leadership contest is in crisis after one of the party’s most senior figures said the election process is being “rigged” to help left-wing candidate Richard Leonard.
In an incendiary letter to party headquarters, Edinburgh South MP Ian Murray called for Labour to re-consider the validity of the members of the Unite trade union who had signed up to vote in the contest.
He also said revelations about interim leader Alex Rowley getting caught backing Leonard raised questions over “impartiality” and called on him to be removed as chair of a panel set up to vet new recruits.
Murray wrote: “We are in danger of undoing all the progress we have made in the last year because the defence of the leadership election process is, at best, clumsy and, at worst, being rigged for a particular process.”
READ MORE: Labour leadership hopeful Anas Sarwar's family firm in multi-million pound revenue hike
A Unite spokesman said: "Ian Murray is wrong. Unite has adhered to the SLP's rules to the letter, and indeed the general secretary and the party's legal and governance unit have all confirmed that our affiliated members are valid.
"We urge Mr Murray to take Brian Roy's advice on this and in doing so withdraw his wrongful accusations about Unite."
A senior Labour source described the Murray letter as a “massive diversionary smokescreen” created to take attention away from the member recruitment strategy pursued by supporters of the other leadership candidate, Anas Sarwar.
The source added: "These are the actions of a crumbling establishment."
Meanwhile, in another development, Leonard was last night nominated by the Edinburgh Southern Constituency Labour party, which has Murray as a member.
Leonard and Sarwar are facing off in the race to succeed Kezia Dugdale, but the battle has become one of the dirtiest leadership contests in years.
Analysis: Anas Sarwar's political ambitions should not overshadow brother Asim's success
A key flashpoint relates to the party’s decision to allow new members and supporters to join and get a vote in the election.
Three routes were available until Monday of this week: joining as a full member; signing up as a registered supporter; or becoming a supporter through an affiliated trade union.
It was claimed that up to 2,700 members of Unite, Labour’s biggest donor and a Leonard backer, may have signed up through the third method.
However, there was also reported unhappiness about the text message Unite had sent its members that led to the potential sign-ups.
Murray, who is backing Sarwar and sits on the party’s governing Scottish Executive committee (SEC), has written to general secretary Brian Roy with concerns.
He wrote: “There is no doubt whatsoever that the way in which Unite has signed up affiliate members to vote in the leadership election is against the rules of the Scottish Labour Party and the process.”
Murray said there are “serious questions” to ask about the Unite sign-up process: “The text clearly failed to ask the recipients if they supported the aims and values of the Labour Party, nor did it ask them to consent for their data to be shared with the party.
“In order for this process to be fair and robust, the party must reconsider whether any sign-ups from this process are valid.”
When the contest began, Rowley said he would not endorse a candidate, but he was covertly recorded expressing support for Leonard. The interim leader has also been linked to plots against Dugdale, which he strenuously denies.
READ MORE: Labour leadership hopeful Anas Sarwar's family firm in multi-million pound revenue hike
Murray wrote: “The additional issue is the sanctity of the newly formed verification panel. It was a good idea for the SEC to initiate this process but it cannot be allowed to continue to function with the Interim Leader of the Scottish Labour party overseeing it given the revelations last week that question both his impartiality and his role in undermining Kezia Dugdale.”
The Murray row is separate from a controversy reported earlier this week by the Herald, over claims that new members had signed up with the same email addresses and mobile phone numbers.
A spokesperson for Scottish Labour said: "Any affiliated or registered supporter would be expected to support the aims and values of the Labour Party. These sign ups are eligible and within the rules of the leadership contest."
A spokesman for the Sarwar campaign said: “If concerns have been raised about an element of the process, the party has a responsibility to investigate and ensure the same strict rules are followed by all involved.”
A spokesperson for the Leonard campaign said: "Trade unionists have had a direct role in Labour leadership elections for decades but now have to meet higher hurdles than ever before to participate: we welcome their involvement as a means of connecting Scottish Labour to workplaces and communities across the country."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel