Officers were called after a “family dispute” at the home of Harvey Weinstein’s daughter on Wednesday as the scandal surrounding the disgraced Hollywood movie mogul continued.
The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) confirmed they were called to reports of a “disturbance” at the house but said no crime had been committed. Weinstein was not there when officers arrived.
An LAPD spokesman said: “At 10.37am Los Angeles Police Department officers responded to the 500 block of North Kilkea Drive at the house of Harvey Weinstein’s daughter and were there for a disturbance call.
“Officers arrived and conducted an investigation. It was revealed that there was no crime and it was a family dispute. Officers then left the scene.”
Harvey Weinstein apologised for his behaviour following allegations published in the New York Times (Richard Shotwell/Invision/AP, File)
The incident follows a string of sexual harassment allegations being levelled against Weinstein from women who worked with him.
British actress and supermodel Cara Delevingne was the latest star to speak out on Wednesday.
She claimed Weinstein made advances towards her in a hotel room after asking her to kiss another woman.
In a statement posted on Instagram she said she was left feeling “very powerless and scared” when he invited her to his hotel room.
Cara Delevingne has spoken out against Harvey Weinstein (Daniel Leal-Olivas/PA)
She said: “I was so hesitant about speaking out….I didn’t want to hurt his family. I felt guilty as if I did something wrong.
“I was also terrified that this sort of thing had happened to so many women I know but no one had said anything because of fear.”
Spectre actress Lea Seydoux also joined the ranks of Harvey Weinstein’s accusers, saying she had to defend herself after the director allegedly jumped on her and tried to kiss her.
The French actress, who won the Palme d’Or at Cannes for Blue Is The Warmest Colour, said the movie mogul stared at her “as if I was a piece of meat”.
Lea Seydoux wrote in the Guardian about her alleged experiences with Weinstein (Aurore Marechal/PA)
Writing in the Guardian, she said: “We were talking on the sofa when he suddenly jumped on me and tried to kiss me. I had to defend myself. He’s big and fat, so I had to be forceful to resist him.
“I left his room, thoroughly disgusted. I wasn’t afraid of him, though. Because I knew what kind of man he was all along.”
On Tuesday, Weinstein was accused of rape by three women – claims Weinstein “unequivocally denies” – and his British wife Georgina Chapman announced she was leaving him.
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, which hosts the Oscars, described the sexual abuse allegations against Harvey Weinstein as “repugnant” and “abhorrent” and said on Wednesday that it would be holding a meeting on Saturday to discuss any action to be taken.
The British Academy of Film and Television Arts (Bafta) also announced it had suspended his membership, effective immediately.
Rose McGowan, another accuser, called for the board of the Weinstein Company to be dissolved following the allegations against its co-founder.
Rose McGowan believes the Weinstein Company should be dissolved (Tony Di Maio/PA)
The actress, 44, tweeted a link to the campaign on website ipetitions.com and said: “Join me in supporting this important cause at iPetitions. DISSOLVE THE BOARD.”
Over 10,000 signatures had been added to the petition by Thursday.
Meanwhile, stars across Hollywood have continued to condemn Weinstein’s behaviour.
Ewan McGregor said Weinstein was a “bully”, Matt Damon said he had been left “absolutely sick to my stomach” while Ben Affleck added he was “saddened and angry that a man who I worked with used his position of power to intimidate, sexually harass and manipulate many women over decades”.
Britain’s Prime Minister Theresa May also spoke out about the scandal on Wednesday.
She said the reports were “deeply concerning” as senior politicians called for Weinstein to be stripped of his CBE.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel