Patients operated on by female surgeons have slightly lower death rates than those treated by men, research suggests.
A new study in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) found a small but significant reduction in death rates of 12% for those patients treated by women compared with men.
But there was no difference between the sexes when it came to patients experiencing readmission to hospital or complications within 30 days.
The researchers, including from the University of Toronto, analysed data for more than 100,000 patients undergoing one of 25 surgical procedures in the same hospital in Ontario, Canada.
The patients were matched for age, sex, range of conditions and income, while surgeons were matched for age, experience and number of operations performed in the last year.
The authors suggested one possible reason for the difference may be that women deliver care that is more in line with guidelines, is more focused on the patient, and involves better communication.
But they said more research was needed.
They concluded: "These findings support the need for further examination of the surgical outcomes and mechanisms related to physicians and the underlying processes and patterns of care to improve mortality, complications, and readmissions for all patients."
In an editorial, Clare Marx and Derek Alderson, from the Royal College of Surgeons of England, said the sex of the surgeon is unlikely to be relevant and the study did not look at longer-term effects for the patient.
They said they were not convinced that the sex of the surgeon "will emerge as an important determinant of a good outcome for patients having surgery".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel