THE vast majority of British Jews, some 83 per cent, believe the Labour Party is too tolerant of anti-Semitism among its MPs, members and supporters, a poll suggests.
This compared with 19 per cent for the Conservatives and 36 per cent for the Liberal Democrats, according to the YouGov survey for Campaign Against Antisemitism[CAA].
The poll follows criticism of Labour's response to anti-Semitism in its ranks, although the party committed in its General Election manifesto to "build a society and world free from all forms of racism, anti-Semitism and Islamophobia".
British Jews are also split on how well institutions protect them.
According to the survey of more than 2,000 British Jews undertaken between July 19 and August 8, 65 per cent believe the UK Government does not do enough to protect British Jews while 52 per cent think the Crown Prosecution Service south of the border could do more.
Sizeable minorities thought the police [41 per cent] and the courts [47 per cent] could do more while only 39 per cent of British Jews felt confident that anti-Semitic hate crime would be prosecuted.
The poll comes after the Community Security Trust, which monitors anti-Semitism in Britain, reported a record number, 767, of anti-Semitic hate incidents in the UK in the first six months of 2017.
Despite this, the CAA/YouGov survey suggests anti-Semitism, measured by how many respondents agreed with seven anti-Semitic statements, has been in decline over the past three years, dropping to 36 per cent in 2017
Gideon Falter, CAA Chairman, said: "We now have data that show that in a very British way, fairly and quietly, Britons have been rejecting anti-Semitic prejudice.
"British society has shunned a growing worldwide addiction to anti-Semitism and proved that so-called British values are no mere buzzphrase, but are embedded in our national being.
"However, our research shows that one in three British Jews has become so fearful of mounting anti-Semitic crime and the failure to excise anti-Semites from politics that they have considered leaving Britain altogether.
"Our research clearly shows that British Jews have pointed their fingers at the Crown Prosecution Service and the Labour Party.
"If British society can fight anti-Semitism, why are our world-renowned criminal justice system and some of our famous political parties still doing too little?”
Mr Falter added: "There is not a moment to lose. Without urgent change, British Jews may start to leave, as has happened elsewhere in Europe."
Sir Eric Pickles, the former Cabinet minister, for Conservative Friends of Israel, said: "Modern anti-Semitism has been allowed to flourish in the left of British politics, unchallenged by the Labour leadership, this report is a wake-up call.
"They cannot continue to be half-hearted in their approach, the time has come to root anti-Semitism out of British life."
Meanwhile, a Labour spokesman stressed how the party campaigned against anti-Semitism and condemned all anti-Semitic abuse.
"That's why Jeremy Corbyn set up the Chakrabarti Inquiry into anti-Semitism. Its recommendations have already led to far-reaching changes to the practices of the Labour Party,” he explained.
"The party has also taken decisive disciplinary action over allegations of anti-Semitism and will continue to do so in the future," added the spokesman.
Labour’s John Mann, who chairs the all-party parliamentary group against anti-Semitism, said: "We know that British Jews are concerned and we are working to address those concerns.
"It is beholden on organisations to not sensationalise anti-Semitism but rather to work to put national frameworks in place to defeat it.
"We will continue to work with CST and other mainstream groups towards this goal,” he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel