Worthless. That is how Frances Stojilkovic’s wages make her feel. “The way we are paid shows that what we do is not valued,” the home carer explains. “Yet we do something that is helps people. We go to people’s homes and we get them dressed and fed and we keep them independence. “We care for them and we have a bond with them, with clients we have worked with for years. We feel like family.
“So when we earn less than, say, a gravedigger, it makes us think that caring is worthless.”
Ms Stojilkovic has changed job slightly, she is now a co-ordinator for home care after 13 years as a carer. She earns £19,000 a year. Colleagues collecting bins get much more.
Campaigners believe carers, including Ms Stojilkovic’s daughter Michelle Symington, get £3 less an hour on average than men in equivalent jobs.
She sees the court victory as a vindication of her work. She said: “Home Carers in Glasgow are all over the moon because we’ve finally got the recognition our jobs deserve, after being so badly undervalued and underpaid for all this time.
“It’s just such a pity we’ve had to fight the City Council for so long to get justice via the courts, but without Action 4 Equality Scotland and organiser Mark Irvine’s support we would never have won our case. “
Ms Stojikovic has personally lobbied the new SNP leaders in Glasgow and run a Facebook page to update thousands of staff on the case.
She bears no ill will to the men, such as gravediggers, who earned more than her for years. “No disrespect to them,” she said, “but we carers e dealing with people’s lives. If it was not for carers, our clients would be in homes and costing the state more.
“Our campaign is about showing that caring is important and making sure future generations get paid fairly and know that what they do is important.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here