Kenya’s opposition has said it will challenge the results of last week’s presidential election in the supreme court and wage a campaign of “civil disobedience”.
Opposition leader Raila Odinga told reporters that Kenyans will not willingly go along with “democracy’s slaughter”.
Mr Odinga has claimed that election results which returned President Uhuru Kenyatta to office were hacked and rigged.
Uhuru Kenyatta won the election (Sayyid Abdul Azim/AP)
The election commission has said there was a hacking attempt, but it failed.
The opposition last week said going to court was not an option, but Mr Odinga’s remarks contradict this. His challenge after losing the 2013 election was unsuccessful.
Mr Odinga’s comments have the potential to set off another wave of protests in the capital, Nairobi, and elsewhere, which have already led to at least two dozen people being shot dead by police since the August 8 vote.
(AP)
“We will not accept and move on,” he said. “We shall hold vigils, moments of silence, beat drums and do everything else to draw attention to the gross electoral injustices.”
Streets of Nairobi’s populous slum of Kibera were empty ahead of Mr Odinga’s statements, with businesses closed as they awaited his announcement.
The opposition stronghold has seen some of the worst clashes between police and civilians protesting against the results after the electoral commission announced Mr Kenyatta’s win late on Friday.
(Ben Curtis/AP)
Meanwhile, Kenya’s interior minister Fred Matiangi stopped an attempt to de-register two civil society groups that pointed out anomalies in the presidential election.
The National Non-governmental Organisations Board has said it de-registered the Kenya Human Rights Commission and called for the arrest of the directors of the Africa Centre for Open Governance.
Both groups monitored the elections.
In a statement, Mr Matiangi said a committee will be formed to look into allegations that the two groups had tax compliance issues and one was not registered.
He also ordered that no action be taken against the groups for 90 days.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article