The Cumbernauld homeowner who tried to raffle off his luxury £800,000 mansion for just £5 has had his hopes and dreams quashed by PayPal.
The online money transferring giant has stepped in to pull the plug “in order to protect customers.”
Thousands of bidders are now in line to be refunded to a tune of around £71,000.
As reported in June, 46-year-old Shamus Fitzsimons became frustrated after failing to sell the seven-bedroom mansion in Dullatur, North Lanarkshire, after it sat on the market for a year.
Along with his other half, the pair ran a competition until Christmas with a target of 250,000 tickets to be sold.
Having gained national attention, Mr Fitzsimons was informed by PayPal that his account had been suspended.
PayPal sent him an email to highlight how he had breached its terms.
The company said in a statement: “We have seen an increase in the number of people setting up house prize draws in recent years, as homeowners seek new ways of disposing of their property in a challenging housing market.
“These prize draws present an unusual challenge. They are difficult to carry out successfully and carry considerable risks, such as the possibility that the property is not accurately described; or that the draw is not conducted fairly; or that entries are made from countries where such prize draws are unlawful.
“After much consideration, we have decided not to allow PayPal to be used to buy tickets for entry to house prize draws in the UK in order to protect consumers, PayPal and the people running such draws from these risks.
“We are sorry to disappoint anyone seeking to use PayPal to run a house draw, but believe this is the right and responsible thing to do.”
The stunning property has a heated swimming pool, sauna, one acre of beautiful garden, and a games room in the west wing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel