CALLS for an urgent review of a controversial qualification have been rebuffed by Scotland’s Deputy First Minister.
John Swinney, the Education Secretary, said any changes to National 4 needed to be “carefully thought through”.
When National 4s were introduced in 2014 as part of the scrapping of Standard Grade the SQA said they would be seen as the equal of other qualifications.
However, teachers and parents have warned the qualification had led to groups of pupils viewing themselves as “second class citizens” because there is no final exam.
New figures from the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) show an 11 per cent decline in interest since 2015 with entries dropping from more than 130,000 to just over 116,000 this year.
Seamus Searson, general secretary of the Scottish Secondary Teachers’ Association, said National 4 had now “reached the end of the road” and called for it to be scrapped.
However, writing in The Herald, Mr Swinney said: “I am aware a number of professional associations have raised their concerns about the National 4 qualification.
“While there is some consensus on the need to review this, there is no agreement on either the specifics of any changes nor the timetable for introducing these.
“Any review of any of our qualifications must be carefully thought through, taking into account the broad range of views of our education bodies, teachers, pupils and parents.
“Any action taken on this must be done sensibly to ensure that all of our qualifications maintain their credibility and that we build on the excellence and achievement in Scottish education.”
Professor Mark Priestly, deputy dean of the faculty of social sciences at Stirling University, said anecdotal evidence suggested teachers were choosing National 5 “by default”.
He said: “The decline in enrolment may be due to a loss of credibility for the new National 4 qualification which was controversially structured to exclude a final exam, in contrast with National 5.
“However, there is substantial anecdotal evidence suggesting the great majority of enrolments are at National level 5 by default, with students who fail subsequently given the choice of re-presenting at National 4 level. This largely accounts for the decline in level 4 enrolments between 2016 and 2017.
“Common-sense would suggest that a wholesale reduction of the range of subjects available for study will also reduce the number of enrolments overall, and I am concerned about a narrowing of the curriculum at this crucial stage in compulsory education.”
The Education Institute of Scotland (EIS) has previously argued the decline was because teachers were no longer entering pupils for both National 4 and the more advanced National 5 as Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) qualifications bedded in.
Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the EIS, said the current decline was therefore a natural consequence of pupils being put forward for the right qualifications.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel