ALCOHOL deaths have spiked to their highest level since the peak of the recession, with health boards that have slashed funding for problem drinking among the worst hit.
New figures show that six out of the seven health boards in Scotland which, combined, cut spending on Alcohol and Drug Partnerships (ADPs) by around £700,000 last year, also recorded a surge in the number of people dying as a result of alcohol abuse.
NHS Lanarkshire, which cut funding for ADPs by 10 per cent in 2016/17 - more than any other health board - experienced a 14 per cent year-on-year increase in alcohol-related deaths from 186 in 2015 to 212 in 2016, the highest number in the region for a decade.
Similar patterns emerged in Dumfries and Galloway, Fife, Grampian, Orkney and Shetland. In Fife, alcohol-related deaths rose by 19 per cent to 74, the highest in five years, at the same time that funding for ADPs was cut by three per cent, while in Grampian a four per cent funding cut coincided with a record 110 deaths linked to problem drinking.
The statistics, produced by the National Records of Scotland, exclude suicides and accidental deaths where alcohol may have played a part.
It comes after a 22 per cent reduction in direct Scottish Government funding for ADPs, which coordinate local interventions to reduce drug and alcohol harm and support recovery. Health boards were expected to make up the difference to prevent a fall in spending, but half failed to do so. Only the Western Isles cut ADP funding without a corresponding increase in alcohol-related deaths, although the numbers are small.
At a national level, alcohol-related deaths rose 10 per cent year-on-year to 1,265 in 2016 - the highest in six years, and the largest annual increase since the 1990s.
Scottish Conservative shadow health secretary Miles Briggs said: “Providing support to those who have a drink problem is vital in helping to turn someone’s life around.
“The fact that under this SNP government we have seen huge cuts to Scotland’s network of alcohol and drug partnerships is clearly impacting on what support is available across communities.”
Scottish Labour’s inequalities spokeswoman Monica Lennon, who lost her own father to alcohol in 2015, added: "The Scottish Government must explain why alcohol-related deaths have increased by 10 per cent in the last year and prove it is willing to take bold action, both on prevention and in making sure the right support is in place for people, especially those affected by poverty. This is why Scottish Labour has opposed cuts to local alcohol-harm support services.”
However, alcohol campaigners have cautioned that it is still too early to determine the long-term effects of the funding cuts to ADPs as even health boards where the spending was either maintained or increased - namely Ayrshire and Arran, Borders and Greater Glasgow and Clyde - deaths linked to problem drinking still went up by between 10 to 19 per cent last year.
Dr Eric Carlin, director of the Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems (SHAAP) said ADPs were "vitally important", but said: "The problem is we don't have enough data yet about what's happened at local level, and where health boards have reduced the funding we can't be sure at what stage this carries through to impact on people's health."
Dr Carlin added that delays to minimum pricing had probably cost more lives.
Bobby Miller, chair of the Lanarkshire ADP, stressed that recent Scotland-wide statistics had shown a decline in the number of Lanarkshire residents exceeding weekly drinking guidelines.
He added: "The average number of mean units consumed by both men and women, is also falling."
Public Health Minister Aileen Campbell said the Scottish Government would "move as quickly as is practicable" to implement minimum pricing if the Supreme Court allows it.
She added: "I will be refreshing our Alcohol Strategy later this year providing opportunity to further consider the additional actions and steps needed to tackle alcohol-related harm in Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel