A rift has formed between former Doctors with Colin Baker accusing Peter Davison of talking “absolute rubbish” after he claimed boys would lose a role model with a female Time Lord.
Baker, 74, has long championed a woman taking over the role for the first time and has been celebrating since Jodie Whittaker’s selection.
Peter Davison with wife Elizabeth Heery (Matt Crossick/PA)
Speaking before an appearance at Comic-Con in San Diego on Thursday, the men displayed divergent moods.
Davison, the fifth Doctor, said Whittaker is a “terrific actress” who will do “wonderful job” and hopes those who find it hard to adjust watch “with an open mind”.
But Davison, 66, told the Press Association: “If I feel any doubts, it’s the loss of a role model for boys who I think Doctor Who is vitally important for.
“So I feel a bit sad about that, but I understand the argument that you need to open it up.
“As a viewer, I kind of like the idea of the Doctor as a boy but then maybe I’m an old fashioned dinosaur, who knows?”
Baker, who has four daughters, previously called the decision to select a woman after 12 men in the role “brave and game-changing casting”.
The sixth Time Lord bluntly disagreed with Davison.
Jodie Whittaker will be the 13th Time Lord (Colin Hutton/BBC)
“They’ve had 50 years of having a role model. So sorry Peter, you’re talking rubbish there – absolute rubbish,” he said.
“Well you don’t have to be of a gender of someone to be a role model. Can’t you be a role model as people?”
Baker also said that he hopes to see a non-white Doctor in the future and that the series should look to America where he feels casting is less dependant on colour.
“They see a future world where that is irrelevant and it’s perhaps time Doctor Who and its fans did too,” he added.
The announcement on Sunday that the Broadchurch star, 35, would take the helm was also met with praise from the outgoing Doctor, Peter Capaldi.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel