Ratings for the latest series of Doctor Who were the lowest since the programme returned to screens in 2005, new figures show.
The BBC One sci-fi favourite attracted an average audience of just 5.5 million during its latest run, which ended on July 1.
Doctor Who average ratings 2005-2017 (PA Graphics)
This was down half a million on the figure for the previous series in 2015, and almost two million below the average ratings for 2014.
The 2017 series – the last to feature Peter Capaldi in the title role – also saw the lowest audience to date for a single episode: 4.7 million, which was recorded for story The Eaters of Light, broadcast on June 17.
BBC handout photo of Peter Capaldi as the Doctor and his new companion Pearl Mackie as Bill Potts (BBC)
Capaldi’s first story as the Doctor, Deep Breath, had an audience of 9.2 million.
Doctor Who has now clocked up 10 series since it was revived in 2005, and has seen a total of four actors piloting the Tardis: Christopher Eccleston, David Tennant, Matt Smith and Capaldi.
Ratings remained steady for much of this period, with every series from 2005 to 2014 averaging between seven and eight million viewers.
(PA Archive)
Only in recent years have audiences started to fall.
The next Doctor is due to be revealed in the 2017 Christmas episode, which will also be the last to be produced by Steven Moffat, who has been in charge of the show since 2010.
Mystery surrounds the identity of the actor who will replace Capaldi as the Doctor, though various names have been linked to the part, including Kris Marshall, Phoebe Waller-Bridge, Maxine Peake and Paterson Joseph.
To date no woman has played the title role, but viewers have already learned that the Doctor’s deadliest enemy the Master is able to regenerate into either a male or a female.
Note: all figures quoted are the official consolidated ratings compiled by Barb, which include people who recorded the programme when it was broadcast and watched it up to seven days afterwards.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel