WITH the ink not yet dry on the Scottish Government’s Next Steps document on the future of school governance the flak is already starting to fly.
Under the policy, headteachers will be given a statutory responsibility to improve standards alongside new powers to hire staff and shape the curriculum.
In addition, the power to improve education has been removed from councils and placed with up to seven so-called regional collaboratives.
The first salvo was fired last week by council umbrella body Cosla who said bypassing councils meant there was no longer any meaningful local democratic accountability for education.
Yesterday, it was the turn of academics and educationalists to question the rationale behind new regions, which were comprehensively opposed by nearly everyone who took part in a recent consultation.
Stirling University’s Professor Walter Humes views the new regions as an “overarching bureaucratic structure”.
Never knowingly out-quoted, educational consultant Keir Bloomer described them as “compulsory, authoritarian, unwanted, bureaucratic and hierarchical”.
All this is in stark contrast to the view of Education Secretary John Swinney that the regions will be collaborative bodies in which council professionals and groups like national schools quango Education Scotland can work together.
When asked last week about the apparent centralising aspect of the new structures Mr Swinney was adamant that was not the intention.
He told The Herald: “They are not going to be supervisory boards. They are improvement collaborations which bring together expertise to make sure we provide seamless improvement to schools.”
So how have we got to a situation so soon where such diametrically opposed views of the new regions are being taken?
The key is the creation of a government-appointed director within the new bodies who will report to the chief inspector of schools at Education Scotland.
Mr Swinney said he wanted the directors to ensure improvement was being driven more consistently across the country in line with national objectives, such as closing the attainment gap.
That is not how it is being seen. Instead, critics argue what has been created is an undemocratic, centralised command and control structure which bypasses council education departments and provides a direct line of communication on progress to the Education Secretary.
But that is not the whole story. As Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the Educational Institute of Scotland, points out there is a genuine problem.
Council cuts have led to the scrapping of quality improvement officers who used to support schools and many local authorities no longer have a dedicated director of education.
The new bodies could be seen, like the former Strathclyde Region, as a valid way to improve support, but a major stumbling block thus far is confusion over what their role is.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel