AROUND 60,000 responses have been submitted to the SNP Government’s consultation on fracking - double the number generated by the original independence referendum.
Nicola Sturgeon revealed the figure at First Minister’s Questions in response to a point from Scottish Green MSP Patrick Harvie.
The consultation on whether to allow the controversial gas extraction technique closed a fortnight ago, and the government response is due later this year.
The 2012 consultation on the independence referendum received 26,219 responses, but the record remains 77,500 for a 2011 listening exercise on same-sex marriage.
Critics say fracking, which involves pumping water and chemicals into underground shale beds to release methane gas, is a threat to pollution, public health and the climate.
Advocates, including Grangemouth owners Ineos, argue fracking teh Central Belt shale beds would provide jobs and reduce the need to import shale gas from the US.
A moratorium on fracking has been in place in Scotland since January 2015.
Mr Harvie said numerous studies had linked chemicals used in fracking, such as benzene and silica dust, to cancer and lung damage, and reminded Ms Sturgeon the SNP manifesto said it would be banned unless proven “beyond doubt” to be safe.
He said: "The scale of the public response is unprecedented, and it's clear only a full, permanent ban will do."
Ms Sturgeon said responses were still being verified but “about 60,000” had arrived, with a “considerable number” via postcard and petition campaigns.
She said the government remained committed to its timetable for decision and to giving MSPs a vote on the issue.
She added: “I would continue to describe myself as somebody who is personally very sceptical about fracking.
“What we said in our manifesto on the subject absolutely stands, and that is the standard by which we will assess the issue.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here