THE SNP is facing questions about the integrity of its fundraising after evidence suggested cash donated for a second referendum was spent on the election - despite strenuous denials.
The party last week abandoned its drive to raise £1m for an independence referendum fight through its ref.scot website in the wake of Nicola Sturgeon losing a third of her MPs.
The online appeal, launched within minutes of Ms Sturgeon announcing a referendum in March, had raised around £482,000 after 90 days of an intended 100-day operation.
It was run by her husband, the SNP chief executive Peter Murrell.
After the appeal ended, the SNP denied any money raised through ref.scot was spent on the general election, and said all £482,000 would be frozen until required for a new vote.
A spokesman said on Tuesday: “The funding that was raised during the period of the ref.scot crowdfunder will only be used for the specific purpose of a referendum campaign.
“In that regard, the money is earmarked. The money spent in the General Election campaign was taken from our general election appeal.”
However on Wednesday, STV published a screengrab from ref.scot taken around April 27, suggesting funds were indeed used for the election.
It showed the donations page message “Your contribution will greatly benefit the campaign” had been amended to read: “Your contribution will greatly benefit the election campaign.”
The SNP refused to offer any explanation for the change.
Scottish Labour MSP James Kelly, who has asked the Electoral Commission to investigate the SNP’s fundraising operation, said the ref.scot saga was “getting murkier and murkier”.
He said: “The SNP needs to come clean on all of this as a matter of urgency.
"It appears that, for a period of time, this website was repurposed as a general election campaign fundraiser.
“If that was the case, people will be rightly angry that the SNP changed the small print.
"Many people will rightly feel misled. We need a statement from [Finance Secretary] Derek Mackay in his role as the Nationalists' campaign manager on this."
Tory MSP Annie Wells added: This revelation calls into question the SNP’s defence of this controversial website.
“The Nationalists were quite clear that any money raised was for an independence campaign.
“Yet now we learn, at various points through the General Election campaign, the cash generated was going into fighting Westminster seats.
“Voters will be furious at this apparent deception, and this leaves the SNP with some very difficult questions to answer indeed.”
An SNP spokesman insisted ref.scot website had only raised money for a referendum fight, but was unable to explain the altered text from April.
The Electoral Commission has said it is up to parties how they spend their funds.
An SNP spokesman said: “The SNP prides ourselves on the open and transparent way we raise money from supporters, it’s nonsense to suggest otherwise.
“Unlike those queuing up to criticise, the SNP has never been fined by the Electoral Commission for financial malpractice.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel