A nurse who challenged the First Minister about the NHS during an election debate has come under fire on social media.
The woman, named Claire, said she was forced to resort to food banks and pressed Nicola Sturgeon on public-sector pay as party leaders took part in the first Scottish TV debate of the General Election campaign.
She said: "There's thousands and thousands of nurse positions unfilled and the reason for that is it's such low pay. It's just not a sustainable income, we can't live on it."
She said colleagues were considering leaving nursing, adding: "You have no idea how demoralising it is to work in the NHS."
Immediately after the debate, in which the invited audience were allowed to ask questions, some people took to social media platform Twitter to criticise the nurse amid false claims she was the wife of a Tory councillor.
The SNP's Joanna Cherry ended up apologising to her in a tweet after reportedly making the claims to BBC Scotland.
She said: "Sorry I was wrong about Twitter rumours. Entirely right that your voice is heard."
However, the woman, who also previously appeared on the BBC's Question Time, was forced to defend herself after Twitter users highlighted pictures of her drinking wine and apparently on holiday in New York.
She tweeted: "Beware! It is now a true representation of your life if you put your high days & holidays on social media even if pd 4 by friends & family."
Health Secretary Shona Robison tweeted after the debate: "Important to hear voices of nurses in #leadersdebate, we are offering to work with unions on pay."
Scottish Conservative MSP Murdo Fraser said it had been a "disgraceful episode" and unacceptable.
He said: "It was a disgraceful episode and Nicola Sturgeon and her party should be thoroughly ashamed.
"This smear operation points to something endemic within the SNP.
"Its supporters talk over critics, not listen. The nationalists will always try to play the man, not the ball. This kind of behaviour is utterly unacceptable."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel