More than 100,000 people have signed an online petition calling for the sexual health aid worker who first uncovered sexual abuse dramatised in BBC drama Three Girls to be recognised by the Government.
Sara Rowbotham’s work was said to have played a crucial role in exposing the abuse of young girls by a gang of Asian men in the Rochdale area.
But the whistleblower was made redundant in 2014, two years after their conviction.
The court case heard the victims – aged between 13 and 15 – were given alcohol, food and money in return for sex but there were times when violence was used.
Ms Rowbotham’s story also featured in Three Girls, which received widespread acclaim for the way in which it tackled the harrowing subject.
Three Girls (Sophie Mutevelian/BBC/PA)
A petition to have her work recognised, set up following the series, has since received in excess of 100,000 signatures on the Change.org website.
The petition states: “Sara, the sexual health worker, was fundamental in collecting evidence involving the Rochdale grooming gangs.
“This evidence, along with the brave survivors of the abuse own statements, was dismissed time and time again.
“Years later some of the men were jailed because of this evidence, without a doubt without Sara and her team this prosecution would never have happened.
“Sara was not only removed from her role as a Sexual Health Worker with young children she was later made redundant from her post.
“The very lady who believed these children, supported these children, never once dismissing these children or gave up on these children was tossed aside.
Lisa Riley in Three Girls (BBC/Sophie Mutevelian)
“Sara and her team should be applauded not only by police and prosecutors but the Government and crown for her services for young people.
“Along with the recognition of their work, Sara and her team should be the highest advocates for future national guidance surrounding the grooming of children.
“The children of Rochdale were failed time and time again, along with Sara and her team.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here