WEST Dunbartonshire is another of Scotland’s smallest authorities The council’s relatively recent history as the country’s most dysfunctional may see West Dunbartonshire remain Labour next week.
A decade ago, the party took unprecedented action over poor performance, sparking a major inquiry, suspending its leader Andy White and preventing him standing in the future election.
It was a pretty low base for the SNP administration that succeeded it between 2007 and 2012 to build on.
Instead, the new regime was split by civil war, a stream of dire inspections by watchdogs and the bizarre spectacle of the chief executive claiming his was bullied by his politicians.
Since Labour again took the reins in 2012 the most remarkable thing about the council is how unremarkable it has become.
An outright majority under the leadership of Martin Rooney has led to a stable administration in the 22-member council and extinguishing any oppositional fire from the local SNP.
Noises in the local media tend to be made Jim Bollan, the Scottish Socialist, and the pony-tailed independent George Black, are now trading as the West Dunbartonshire Community Party.
Jackie Baillie, the local MSP, is also a pivotal Labour presence in the area and at the forefront of its ability to make political capital from the jobs at nearby Faslane Naval Base and fears around the future of the Vale of Leven hospital.
Given some internal SNP concerns about the energy of its local campaign in the area, Mr Rooney appears to have more grounds for optimism than party colleagues in similar shoes.
“But it’s gone stale”, said one SNP source. “West Dunbartonshire needs a boost of energy and ideas.”
It is fielding enough candidates for an overall majority and sees the success of local MP Martin Docherty, whose sister is standing on May 4, as indicative of SNP support.
Whichever party wins has the perennial problem for any West Dunbartonshire administration. Dominated by Clydebank and Dumbarton, the council was once dubbed “Noah’s Ark”. It was required to have two of everything.
Even parties have internal splits based on local rivalries.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here