THE troubled £2 billion privatisation of the Government's flagship Green Investment Bank (GIB) is expected to be finalised today.
It is understood that the £3 billion deal to sell the Edinburgh-based bank to Australian investment bank Macquarie which has been plagued by delays, political opposition and a legal challenge, has been completed with an official announcement imminent.
The move has previously concerned Scottish ministers who feared the prospect of an asset-stripping of the bank, which supports offshore windfarms and other green projects.
Earlier this month a London High Court ruling backed the government's decision to sell to to a consortium led by Macquarie, rejecting a request from a rival bidder to review decisions about the sale made by ministers.
Sustainable Development Capital LLP, or SDCL, had asked the High Court for a judicial review of the planned sale of the bank after it failed to win preferred bidder status.
The government selected the Macquarie consortium as preferred bidder in September, last year, but SDCL argued the government was not compliant with criteria set out to guide ministers in their decision.
It is believed the deal may include a commitment to keep the GIB's headquarters in Edinburgh. In his judgement on the judicial review, Mr Justice Lewis noted the parties “have now reached agreement in principle on the terms of the sale and are now in a position to sign a binding, contractual agreement”.
The Labour party, Liberal Democrats, Greens and former Conservative ministers have all raised concerns in the past that privatisation may see the bank lose its environmental purpose.
Earlier this year, in a letter to the Westminster business department, Keith Brown, the Scottish cabinet secretary for the economy said he was “frustrated” at being kept in the dark over the sale of the publicly owned bank.
“Reports have indicated that the completion of the transaction process will result in the complete break-up of the current Green Investment Bank portfolio and may result in an asset-stripping exercise with significant financial rewards for any new owner. This is deeply troubling,” said Keith Brown in the letter to Nick Hurd, the climate minister.
Mr Brown continued: “The Scottish government does not believe that the approach to privatisation being reported is in line with the reassurances given in the autumn of 2015.”
Macquarie has previously refused to comment directly on the asset-stripping claim, but issued a statement saying it was one of the world’s most committed investors in renewable energy, having invested or arranged £8.5bn of investment since 2010.
Official documents last month showed that the privatisation had already cost at least £1 million of taxpayer money in consultancy fees.
Ministers have promised that the sale of the bank, which has invested in green projects from offshore windfarms to energy-saving street lights, will deliver value for taxpayers’ money.
GIB, which was set up by the government in 2012 to speed Britain’s switch from fossil fuel-fired power generation, has backed projects from wind farms to biogas plants. It was put up for sale last year as part of a drive to raise money from privatisation.
Green Investment Bank chief executive Shaun Kingsbury at the launch of the bank
It made a net pre-tax loss of £6.2 million in its first ten-and-a-half months of doing business, when it had access to £3 billion of public money to invest in four priority sectors: offshore wind, energy efficiency, waste-to-energy, and waste recycling.
Macquarie, the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and GIB declined to comment on the sale developments.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel