BORIS Johnson and Downing Street have attempted to reassure the people of Gibraltar that the UK will stand up for the British overseas territory during the Brexit negotiations.
Gibraltar's government has accused Spain of trying to use Brexit to advance its territorial claims to the Rock, after an EU proposal to give Madrid a veto over decisions on the territory's future.
Prime Minister Theresa May has been criticised for failing to mention Gibraltar in her letter triggering Article 50, while the negotiation guidelines set out by the European Council would require Spanish agreement for the territory to be included in future agreements between the EU and UK.
Johnson, the foreign secretary, held talks with Gibraltar's chief minister Fabian Picardo in an effort to reassure him of the UK's continued support, while Downing Street highlighted comments made by May in her Commons statement on Brexit on Wednesday.
The Prime Minister told MPs that the territory was "covered by our exit negotiations" and vowed never to enter into talks over its sovereignty against the wishes of its people.
Picardo said the territory was being singled out for "unnecessary, unjustified and unacceptable" discrimination as a result of "a disgraceful attempt by Spain to manipulate the European Council for its own narrow political interests".
Accusing Madrid of seeking to "mortgage the future relationship between the EU and Gibraltar to its usual obsession with our homeland", Picardo said: "The whole world and the whole EU should know: this changes nothing in respect of our continued, exclusive British sovereignty."
After his talks with Picardo, the foreign secretary said: "As ever, the UK remains implacable and rock-like in our support for Gibraltar."
Spain has a long-standing territorial claim on Gibraltar, which has been held by the UK since 1713 and has the status of British overseas territory.
Any suggestion Madrid might have a say over the future of the self-governing territory, which is home to important UK military bases, causes anxiety among its 30,000 inhabitants.
Gibraltar is addressed in a single paragraph of European Council President Donald Tusk's nine-page document, which says: "After the United Kingdom leaves the Union, no agreement between the EU and the United Kingdom may apply to the territory of Gibraltar without the agreement between the Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom."
Downing Street said May had made clear the Government was "absolutely steadfast in our support of Gibraltar, its people and its economy" in the House of Commons on Wednesday.
But Lord Boswell, chairman of the House of Lords EU Committee, said it was "unfortunate that the Prime Minister's letter to Donald Tusk, triggering Article 50, made no mention of Gibraltar - the Government mustn't give the impression that Gibraltar is an afterthought".
He said: "In the absence of any clear commitment to defend Gibraltar's interests by the Prime Minister, the door has been opened for the EU to present it as a disputed territory, without a voice of its own in negotiations that will have profound implications for its future prosperity."
In another development, shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer insisted that the people of Gibraltar must not be used as a "bargaining chip" in the negotiations.
The Labour MP wrote on Twitter: "Spoke to Brexit Secretary David Davis this morning about vital need to protect sovereignty & interests of Gibraltar. Not a bargaining chip."
A spokesman for Sir Keir said he was raising the "understandable concerns of British citizens in Gibraltar and emphasised that it is vital that the sovereignty of Gibraltar is protected and that the interests of British citizens in Gibraltar are safeguarded".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel